Literature DB >> 18564113

Diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure in a population-based cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Joanna M Peloquin1, Darrell S Pardi, William J Sandborn, Joel G Fletcher, Cynthia H McCollough, Beth A Schueler, James A Kofler, Felicity T B Enders, Sara J Achenbach, Edward V Loftus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For diagnosis, assessing disease activity, complications and extraintestinal manifestations, and monitoring response to therapy, patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergo many radiological studies employing ionizing radiation. However, the extent of radiation exposure in these patients is unknown.
METHODS: A population-based inception cohort of 215 patients with inflammatory bowel disease from Olmsted County, Minnesota, diagnosed between 1990 and 2001, was identified. The total effective dose of diagnostic ionizing radiation was estimated for each patient. Linear regression was used to assess the median total effective dose since symptom onset.
RESULTS: The number of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis was 103 and 112, with a mean age at diagnosis of 38.6 and 39.4 yr, respectively. Mean follow-up was 8.9 yr for Crohn's disease and 9.0 yr for ulcerative colitis. Median total effective dose for Crohn's disease was 26.6 millisieverts (mSv) (range, 0-279) versus 10.5 mSv (range, 0-251) for ulcerative colitis (P < 0.001). Computed tomography accounted for 51% and 40% of total effective dose, respectively. Patients with Crohn's disease had 2.46 times higher total effective dose than ulcerative colitis patients (P= 0.001), adjusting for duration of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Annualizing our data, the radiation exposure in the inflammatory bowel disease population was equivalent to the average annual background radiation dose from naturally occurring sources in the U.S. (3.0 mSv). However, a subset of patients had substantially higher doses. The development of imaging management guidelines to minimize radiation dose, dose-reduction techniques in computed tomography, and faster, more robust magnetic resonance techniques are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18564113      PMCID: PMC2831296          DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01920.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  52 in total

1.  Linear no-threshold dogma.

Authors:  M Tubiana
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Crohn's disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning.

Authors:  R N Low; I R Francis; D Politoske; M Bennett
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Ulcerative colitis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940-1993: incidence, prevalence, and survival.

Authors:  E V Loftus; M D Silverstein; W J Sandborn; W J Tremaine; W S Harmsen; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose.

Authors:  F A Mettler; P W Wiest; J A Locken; C A Kelsey
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.394

7.  Calculation of effective dose.

Authors:  C H McCollough; B A Schueler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Patient dose from barium procedures.

Authors:  R Ruiz-Cruces; F Ruiz; M Pérez-Martínez; J López; I Tort Ausina; A D de los Ríos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries.

Authors:  E Cardis; M Vrijheid; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; F Bermann; G Cowper; J Fix; C Hacker; B Heinmiller; M Marshall; I Thierry-Chef; D Utterback; Y-O Ahn; E Amoros; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; J Bernar Solano; A Biau; E Combalot; P Deboodt; A Diez Sacristan; M Eklof; H Engels; G Engholm; G Gulis; R Habib; K Holan; H Hyvonen; A Kerekes; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Martuzzi; A Mastauskas; A Monnet; M Moser; M S Pearce; D B Richardson; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-29

10.  Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Nakayama; Kazuo Awai; Yoshinori Funama; Masahiro Hatemura; Masanori Imuta; Takeshi Nakaura; Da Ryu; Shoji Morishita; Shamima Sultana; Natsuko Sato; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  46 in total

1.  Crohn's disease: Cost-effectiveness of reducing radiation in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Lena B Palmer
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Use of abdominopelvic computed tomography in emergency departments and rates of urgent diagnoses in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Caroline Kerner; Kathleen Carey; Angela M Mills; Wei Yang; Marie B Synnestvedt; Susan Hilton; Mark G Weiner; James D Lewis
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 3.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Cancer risk related to gastrointestinal diagnostic radiation exposure.

Authors:  Mimi L Chang; Jason K Hou
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-10

5.  Evaluation of Crohn's disease activity: initial validation of a magnetic resonance enterography global score (MEGS) against faecal calprotectin.

Authors:  Jesica C Makanyanga; Doug Pendsé; Nikolaos Dikaios; Stuart Bloom; Sara McCartney; Emma Helbren; Elaine Atkins; Terry Cuthbertson; Shonit Punwani; Alastair Forbes; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Radiating disparity in IBD.

Authors:  Mark Flasar; Seema Patil
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging studies among patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a safety-net health-care system.

Authors:  Jason K Hou; Hoda M Malaty; Selvi Thirumurthi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Magnetic resonance enterography: safe and effective imaging for stricturing Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Christina Y Ha; Nitin Kumar; Constantine A Raptis; Vamsi R Narra; Matthew A Ciorba
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Combining two imaging techniques is best to diagnose small-bowel Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Giovanni Maconi; Gabriele Bianchi Porro
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-01-27

Review 10.  Diagnostic advances in inflammatory bowel disease (imaging and laboratory).

Authors:  Maria E Moscandrew; Edward V Loftus
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.