Literature DB >> 10814752

Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect.

E Brenner1, J B Smeets.   

Abstract

To achieve perceptual alignment between a flashed target and a moving one, subjects typically require the flashed target to be aligned with a position that the moving target will only reach some time after the flash (the flash-lag effect). We examined how the magnitude of this misalignment changes near an abrupt change in velocity. The magnitude of the misalignment turns out to depend on the target's velocity after, rather than before, the flash. Thus, the misalignment cannot be caused by motion extrapolation. Neither can it be the inevitable consequence of a difference between the time it takes to process flashed and moving stimuli, because the magnitude of the misalignment is influenced by the extent to which subjects can anticipate the flash. We propose that it is the consequence of having to 'sample' the moving target's position in response to the flash.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10814752     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00067-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Authors:  Taiki Fukiage; David Whitney; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Ozgur Yilmaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Perceptual mislocalization of bouncing balls by professional tennis referees.

Authors:  David Whitney; Nicole Wurnitsch; Byron Hontiveros; Elizabeth Louie
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Christopher R L Cantor; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Flash-lag effect: complicating motion extrapolation of the moving reference-stimulus paradoxically augments the effect.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann; Carolina Murd; Endel Põder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-05

8.  Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Saumil S Patel; R James Cotton; Matthias Bethge; Xaq Pitkow; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Feature binding of a continuously changing object.

Authors:  Para Kang; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  The buzz-lag effect.

Authors:  Cristiano Cellini; Lisa Scocchia; Knut Drewing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.