Literature DB >> 17868767

Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect.

Christopher R L Cantor1, Clifton M Schor.   

Abstract

When two moving objects are presented in perfect alignment, but are not visible for the same amount of time, the briefer object will often be perceived as "lagging" the object of greater duration. Most investigations of this flash-lag effect (FLE) employ high velocity broadband stimuli, such as lines or dots with sharp boundaries and flashes with rapid onset and offset. We introduce a stimulus paradigm with narrow-band stimuli and measure the stimulus dependence of the FLE when basic stimulus parameters of spatio-temporal frequency and temporal duration are varied. We suggest that this dependence is consistent with the involvement of early visual mechanisms and interpret our results in the context of existing theories of the FLE.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17868767      PMCID: PMC2247480          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position.

Authors:  B Krekelberg; M Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness.

Authors:  D M Eagleman; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process.

Authors:  B Krekelberg; M Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction.

Authors:  S S Patel; H Ogmen; H E Bedell; V Sampath
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation.

Authors:  D Whitney; I Murakami
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model.

Authors:  M C Morrone; D C Burr
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-12-22

7.  Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision.

Authors:  M A Georgeson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual delay as a function of luminance.

Authors:  J A Wilson; S M Anstis
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1969-09

9.  Motion extrapolation in catching.

Authors:  R Nijhawan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time.

Authors:  J M Williams; A Lit
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  5 in total

1.  An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  William T Wojtach; Kyongje Sung; Sandra Truong; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Beyond motion extrapolation: vestibular contribution to head-rotation-induced flash-lag effects.

Authors:  Xin He; Jianying Bai; Yi Jiang; Tao Zhang; Min Bao
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  The Flash-Lag Effect as a Motion-Based Predictive Shift.

Authors:  Mina A Khoei; Guillaume S Masson; Laurent U Perrinet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  The haptic and the visual flash-lag effect and the role of flash characteristics.

Authors:  Knut Drewing; Elena Hitzel; Lisa Scocchia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Do the flash-lag effect and representational momentum involve similar extrapolations?

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.