Literature DB >> 30365390

Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.

Manivannan Subramaniyan1,2, Alexander S Ecker1,3,4,5, Saumil S Patel1, R James Cotton1, Matthias Bethge3,4,6,5, Xaq Pitkow1,5,7, Philipp Berens1,3,4,8,5, Andreas S Tolias1,4,5,7.   

Abstract

When the brain has determined the position of a moving object, because of anatomical and processing delays the object will have already moved to a new location. Given the statistical regularities present in natural motion, the brain may have acquired compensatory mechanisms to minimize the mismatch between the perceived and real positions of moving objects. A well-known visual illusion-the flash lag effect-points toward such a possibility. Although many psychophysical models have been suggested to explain this illusion, their predictions have not been tested at the neural level, particularly in a species of animal known to perceive the illusion. To this end, we recorded neural responses to flashed and moving bars from primary visual cortex (V1) of awake, fixating macaque monkeys. We found that the response latency to moving bars of varying speed, motion direction, and luminance was shorter than that to flashes, in a manner that is consistent with psychophysical results. At the level of V1, our results support the differential latency model positing that flashed and moving bars have different latencies. As we found a neural correlate of the illusion in passively fixating monkeys, our results also suggest that judging the instantaneous position of the moving bar at the time of flash-as required by the postdiction/motion-biasing model-may not be necessary for observing a neural correlate of the illusion. Our results also suggest that the brain may have evolved mechanisms to process moving stimuli faster and closer to real time compared with briefly appearing stationary stimuli. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We report several observations in awake macaque V1 that provide support for the differential latency model of the flash lag illusion. We find that the equal latency of flash and moving stimuli as assumed by motion integration/postdiction models does not hold in V1. We show that in macaque V1, motion processing latency depends on stimulus luminance, speed and motion direction in a manner consistent with several psychophysical properties of the flash lag illusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  V1; flash lag illusion; latency; monkey; motion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30365390      PMCID: PMC6295525          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00792.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina.

Authors:  M J Berry; I H Brivanlou; T A Jordan; M Meister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli.

Authors:  Marcus V C Baldo; Alexandre H Kihara; Janaina Namba; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Visual response latencies in striate cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  J H Maunsell; J R Gibson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  William T Wojtach; Kyongje Sung; Sandra Truong; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior.

Authors:  Ingo Fründ; N Valentin Haenel; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Latency: another potential code for feature binding in striate cortex.

Authors:  T J Gawne; T W Kjaer; B J Richmond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Extrapolation or attention shift?

Authors:  M V Baldo; S A Klein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Object-centered shifts of receptive field positions in monkey primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Amy M Ni; Scott O Murray; Gregory D Horwitz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  8 in total

1.  Frequency-separated principal component analysis of cortical population activity.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Thivierge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Predictions drive neural representations of visual events ahead of incoming sensory information.

Authors:  Tessel Blom; Daniel Feuerriegel; Philippa Johnson; Stefan Bode; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Predictive Coding with Neural Transmission Delays: A Real-Time Temporal Alignment Hypothesis.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn; Anthony N Burkitt
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-05-07

5.  Motion extrapolation in the High-Phi illusion: Analogous but dissociable effects on perceived position and perceived motion.

Authors:  Philippa Johnson; Sidney Davies; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual Responses to Moving and Flashed Stimuli of Neurons in Domestic Pigeon (Columba livia domestica) Optic Tectum.

Authors:  Shuman Huang; Xiaoke Niu; Jiangtao Wang; Zhizhong Wang; Huaxing Xu; Li Shi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Interocular Transfer: The Dichoptic Flash-Lag Effect in Controls and Amblyopes.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Yutong Song; Meng Liao; Robert F Hess; Longqian Liu; Alexandre Reynaud
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.925

8.  Color Modulates Feature Integration.

Authors:  Harpreet Saini; Heather Jordan; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.