Literature DB >> 10715377

A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance.

M Yoshii1, K Yanashima, T Wakaguri, F Sakemi, Y Kikuchi, S Suzuki, S Okisaka.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the reproducibility as well as the effect of luminance in multifocal electroretinogram (mERG).
METHODS: Multifocal electroretinogram recordings were repeated on different days in 6 normal subjects using the Veris III system. The mean luminance of the monitor displaying the stimuli was randomly varied by five kinds of neutral density (ND) filters.
RESULTS: The standard deviation of mERG amplitude from the macular region was approximately 10% of the mean value for each normal subject. Reproducibility largely depended on the condition of the subject and placement of the contact lens electrode. With decreases in the mean luminance of the monitor, the amplitude of mERG decreased exponentially, whereas the peak latency increased linearly. mERGs elicited from a patient with mild cortical cataract resembled the mERGs obtained from the control group using an ND filter between -0.30 and -0.52 log, whereas two patients with typical retinitis pigmentosa showed much lower response densities in mERGs.
CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to pay attention to the reproducibility and the luminance effect to obtain reliable mERGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10715377     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(99)00189-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  9 in total

1.  The effects of pupil size on the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  P Gonzalez; S Parks; F Dolan; D Keating
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The influence of luminance on the multifocal ERG.

Authors:  Thilo Schimitzek; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Gungor Sobaci; Mehmet Z Bayraktar
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Test-retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and humphrey visual fields in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  William Seiple; Colleen J Clemens; Vivienne C Greenstein; Ronald E Carr; Karen Holopigian
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Influence of cataract on the multifocal ERG recording--a pre- and postoperative comparison.

Authors:  Ursula V Wördehoff; Anja M Palmowski; Bernhild Heinemann-Vernaleken; Reiner Allgayer; Klaus W Ruprecht
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Can we do without mydriasis in multifocal ERG recordings?

Authors:  Charlotte M Poloschek; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Test-retest variability of multifocal electroretinography in normal volunteers and short-term variability in hydroxychloroquine users.

Authors:  David J Browning; Chong Lee
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-07

8.  Reproducibility of the mfERG between instruments.

Authors:  Wendy W Harrison; Marcus A Bearse; Jason S Ng; Shirin Barez; Marilyn E Schneck; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  The Success of Cataract Surgery and the Preoperative Measurement of Retinal Function by Electrophysiological Techniques.

Authors:  Jing An; Lei Zhang; Yusheng Wang; Zuoming Zhang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.