Literature DB >> 15104169

Influence of cataract on the multifocal ERG recording--a pre- and postoperative comparison.

Ursula V Wördehoff1, Anja M Palmowski, Bernhild Heinemann-Vernaleken, Reiner Allgayer, Klaus W Ruprecht.   

Abstract

To study the influence of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG), 18 patients underwent mfERG recordings prior to and following cataract surgery. The central 50 degrees of the retina were stimulated by 103 hexagons alternating independently between white and black according to a binary m-sequence. The frame rate was 75 Hz. The maximum luminance was 200 cd/m2, the minimum luminance < 1 cd/m2 with a mean luminance of 100 cd/m2. For each retinal location, the latencies of the first negative peak (N1), the first positive peak (P1) and the second negative peak (N2) as well as the amplitude from N1 to P1 and the amplitude from P1 to N2 of the first order response were obtained. Concentric ring averages around the foveal response were analyzed. Following cataract surgery, the mean amplitude of the response in the central four degrees increased from 37.83 to 42.37 for N1P1 (p = 0.019) and from 39.44 to 47.20 for P1N2 (p = 0.001). To reduce the influence of retest variability, each response average was divided by the recording's overall amplitude. For the central 4 degrees this ratio increased by 0.18 (p = 0.002) for N1P1 and by 0.27 (p < 0.001) for P1N2. Clouding of the optic media such as produced by cataracts has a slight but significant influence on the multifocal ERG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104169     DOI: 10.1023/b:doop.0000018394.84831.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  33 in total

1.  The multifocal ERG in open angle glaucoma--a comparison of high and low contrast recordings in high- and low-tension open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  A M Palmowski; R Allgayer; B Heinemann-Vemaleken
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The effect of time of day and repeat reliability on the fast flicker multifocal ERG.

Authors:  B Heinemann-Vernaleken; A Palmowski; R Allgayer
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The multifocal electroretinogram in age-related maculopathies.

Authors:  S Huang; D Wu; F Jiang; J Ma; L Wu; J Liang; G Luo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  [Reproducibility and wave analysis of multifocal electroretinography].

Authors:  K Aoyagi; Y Kimura; H Isono; H Akiyama; T Sugawara
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1998-05

5.  Multifocal electroretinography in patients with Stargardt's macular dystrophy.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; M W Seeliger; K Ruether; T Usui; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; E Zrenner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  [Effect of cataracts on contrast pattern reversal stimuli exemplified by the pattern electroretinogram].

Authors:  K Mauck; E Dodt; O E Schnaudigel; C Ohrloff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  A note on senile cataracts and the electroretinogram.

Authors:  H M Burian; C A Burns
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  [Multifocal electroretinogram (MF-ERG) in diagnosis of macular changes. Example: senile macular degeneration].

Authors:  A M Palmowski; E E Sutter; M A Bearse; W Fung
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Multifocal electroretinogram in occult macular dystrophy.

Authors:  C H Piao; M Kondo; A Tanikawa; H Terasaki; Y Miyake
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The nature and extent of retinal dysfunction associated with diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  V C Greenstein; K Holopigian; D C Hood; W Seiple; R E Carr
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  8 in total

1.  Pattern reversal ERG with LED-stimulation using cyclic summation technique.

Authors:  Barbara Link; Anselm Jünemann; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Improved retinal function after trabeculectomy in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Elisabeth Wittström; Patrik Schatz; Monica Lövestam-Adrian; Vesna Ponjavic; Anders Bergström; Sten Andréasson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Macular vascular density and visual function after phacoemulsification in cataract patients with non-pathological high myopia: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Yang; Zhibing Zeng; Jiancheng Mu; Wei Fan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  The influence of mild cataract on ISCEV standard electroretinogram recorded from mydriatic eyes.

Authors:  Atsuhiro Tanikawa; Keita Suzuki; Ryoko Nomura; Hidenori Tanaka; Tadashi Mizuguchi; Yoshiaki Shimada; Masayuki Horiguchi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  A comparison of the fast stimulation multifocal-ERG in patients with an IOL and control groups of different age.

Authors:  Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe; Ursula Woerdehoff
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Electrophysiology as a prognostic indicator of visual recovery in diabetic patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Fuliang Li; Jiawen Li; Jun Lin; Meifang Liu; Gang Wang; Min Wang; Li Ran; Anthony G Robson; Shiying Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Therapeutic effect of dexamethasone implant in retinal vein occlusions resistant to anti-VEGF therapy.

Authors:  Josh Wallsh; Behnam Sharareh; Ron Gallemore
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-25

8.  The Success of Cataract Surgery and the Preoperative Measurement of Retinal Function by Electrophysiological Techniques.

Authors:  Jing An; Lei Zhang; Yusheng Wang; Zuoming Zhang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 1.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.