Literature DB >> 10641310

The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

B McElree1, M Carrasco.   

Abstract

Feature and conjunction searches have been argued to delineate parallel and serial operations in visual processing. The authors evaluated this claim by examining the temporal dynamics of the detection of features and conjunctions. The 1st experiment used a reaction time (RT) task to replicate standard mean RT patterns and to examine the shapes of the RT distributions. The 2nd experiment used the response-signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure to measure discrimination (asymptotic detection accuracy) and detection speed (processing dynamics). Set size affected discrimination in both feature and conjunction searches but affected detection speed only in the latter. Fits of models to the SAT data that included a serial component overpredicted the magnitude of the observed dynamics differences. The authors concluded that both features and conjunctions are detected in parallel. Implications for the role of attention in visual processing are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10641310      PMCID: PMC3313830          DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  54 in total

1.  Benefits from attention depend on the target type in location-precued discrimination.

Authors:  M L Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1992-12

2.  Search performance without eye movements.

Authors:  R Klein; M Farrell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

3.  Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.

Authors:  A V Reed
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search.

Authors:  B Zenger; M Fahle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search.

Authors:  M Carrasco; K S Frieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets.

Authors:  R Ward; J L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search.

Authors:  W S Geisler; K L Chou
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: an evaluative review.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; J T Townsend
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-05

9.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Semantic memory retrieval: analysis by speed accuracy tradeoff functions.

Authors:  A T Corbett; W A Wickelgren
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  51 in total

1.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

Authors:  M Carrasco; B McElree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reliability of macaque frontal eye field neurons signaling saccade targets during visual search.

Authors:  N P Bichot; K G Thompson; S Chenchal Rao; J D Schall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time.

Authors:  B McElree; J Nordlie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

4.  Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Brian McElree; Kristina Denisova; Anna Marie Giordano
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

6.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Attention searches nonuniformly in space and in time.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Douglas McLelland; Mathilde Lajous; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A time course analysis of enriched composition.

Authors:  Brian McElree; Liina Pylkkänen; Martin J Pickering; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

9.  Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect.

Authors:  Anina N Rich; Melina A Kunar; Michael J Van Wert; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.