Literature DB >> 16724768

A time course analysis of enriched composition.

Brian McElree1, Liina Pylkkänen, Martin J Pickering, Matthew J Traxler.   

Abstract

Linguistic analyses suggest that common and seemingly simple expressions, such as began the book, cannot be interpreted with simple compositional processes; rather, they require enriched composition to provide an interpretation, such as began reading the book (Jackendoff, 1997; Pustejovsky, 1995). Recent reading time studies have supported these accounts by providing evidence that these expressions are more costly to process than are minimally contrasting controls (e.g., McElree, Traxler, Pickering, Seely, and Jackendoff, 2001). We report a response signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) study in which two types of expressions that are thought to require enriched composition were examined. Analyses of the full time course SAT data indicate that these expressions were interpreted less accurately and, most importantly, more slowly than control sentences. The latter finding suggests that enriched composition requires the online deployment of complex compositional operations.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16724768     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Reading time evidence for enriched composition.

Authors:  B McElree; M J Traxler; M J Pickering; R E Seely; R Jackendoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-01

3.  Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time.

Authors:  B McElree; J Nordlie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

4.  The difficulty of coercion: a response to de Almeida.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Brian McElree; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory.

Authors:  A V Reed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-01
  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  Word category conversion causes processing costs: evidence from adjectival passives.

Authors:  Britta Stolterfoht; Helga Gese; Claudia Maienborn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  The time course of task switching: a speed--accuracy trade-off analysis.

Authors:  Hossein Samavatyan; Craig Leth-Steensen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

3.  Complement Coercion: Distinguishing Between Type-Shifting and Pragmatic Inferencing.

Authors:  Argyro Katsika; David Braze; Ashwini Deo; Maria Mercedes Piñango
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2012

4.  Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  The difficult mountain: enriched composition in adjective-noun phrases.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Martin J Pickering; Brian McElree
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

6.  Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing.

Authors:  Andrea E Martin; Brian McElree
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Relational vs. attributive interpretation of nominal compounds differentially engages angular gyrus and anterior temporal lobe.

Authors:  Christine Boylan; John C Trueswell; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Arim Choi; Neil Cohn; Martin Paczynski; Ray Jackendoff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Prominence-sensitive pronoun resolution: New evidence from the speed-accuracy tradeoff procedure.

Authors:  Dave Kush; Clinton L Johns; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.