Literature DB >> 9425680

Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search.

B Zenger1, M Fahle.   

Abstract

In many visual search tasks, reaction times (RTs) for target detection are measured as a function of display size. The corresponding error rates are usually low but increase with increasing display size. Missed-target errors are more common than false alarms. In recent models of visual search, the error rates were attributed to a premature search termination and error rates increasing with display size were interpreted as indicating a speed-accuracy trade-off and an underestimation of search times per item (obtained from RT slopes). A model is described in which errors occur as a result of imperfect rather than incomplete search (i.e., it is assumed that there are task-specific probabilities of categorizing a target or a distractor incorrectly). Signal-detection theory is used to show that the observed error rate properties can be attributed to an optimized decision strategy. "Corrections" of RT data are thus questionable.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9425680     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.6.1783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  12 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Aging and attentional guidance during visual search: functional neuroanatomy by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  David J Madden; Timothy G Turkington; James M Provenzale; Laura L Denny; Linda K Langley; Thomas C Hawk; R Edward Coleman
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-03

3.  Interactions between luminance and colour channels in visual search and their relationship to parallel neural channels in vision.

Authors:  Josephine C H Li; Geoff P Sampson; Trichur R Vidyasagar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

5.  The effect of expert knowledge on medical search: medical experts have specialized abilities for detecting serious lesions.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Chisaki Watanabe; Eriko Maeda; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Izuru Matsuda; Soichiro Miki; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 6.  Colour processing in complex environments: insights from the visual system of bees.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Angelique C Paulk; David H Reser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dynamic upper and lower visual field preferences within the human dorsal frontoparietal attention network.

Authors:  Antje Kraft; Wieland H Sommer; Sein Schmidt; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect.

Authors:  Anina N Rich; Melina A Kunar; Michael J Van Wert; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Lars Chittka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed.

Authors:  Michael J Van Wert; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.