Literature DB >> 7941377

Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

J Palmer1.   

Abstract

In visual search, both attentional and non-attentional sensory processes contribute to set-size effects. Here, non-attentional sensory effects were controlled and the remaining effects matched closely the purely attentional effects measured by a cueing paradigm. Using these controls, set-size effects were measured for five simple and two more complex tasks. The set-size effects were of similar magnitude for all of the simple tasks and larger for the complex tasks. For stimuli in the simple tasks, the results were consistent with the existence of a purely attentional effect on decision processing that is independent of the particular stimulus.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7941377     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90128-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  72 in total

1.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

Authors:  M Carrasco; B McElree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C Penpeci-Talgar; M Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

5.  Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Authors:  Alan R Pinkus; Miriam J Poteet; Allan J Pantle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-03

6.  Does precision decrease with set size?

Authors:  Helga Mazyar; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

8.  Are there capacity limitations in symmetry perception?

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler; Justin A Junge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

9.  Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  C Shawn Green; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.