Literature DB >> 15095936

The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

P M Greenwood1, Raja Parasuraman.   

Abstract

A model of visual search (Greenwood & Parasuraman, 1999) postulating that visuospatial attention is composed of two processing components--shifting and scaling of a variable-gradient attentional focus--was tested in three experiments. Whereas young participants are able to dynamically constrict or expand the focus of visuospatial attention on the basis of prior information, in healthy aging individuals visuospatial attention becomes a poorly focused beam, unable to be constricted around one array element. In the present work, we sought to examine predictions of this view in healthy young and older participants. An attentional focus constricted in response to an element-sized precue had the strongest facilitatory effect on visual search. However, this was true only when the precue correctly indicated the location of a target fixed in size. When precues incorrectly indicated target location or when target size varied, the optimal spatial scale of attention for search was larger, encompassing a number of array elements. Healthy aging altered the deployment of attentional scaling: The benefit of valid precues on search initially (in participants 65-74 years of age) was increased but later (in those 75-85 years of age) was reduced. The results also provided evidence that cue size effects are attentional, not strategic. This evidence is consistent with the proposed model of attentional scaling in visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15095936      PMCID: PMC1350933          DOI: 10.3758/bf03194857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  61 in total

1.  Delayed striate cortical activation during spatial attention.

Authors:  Toemme Noesselt; Steve A Hillyard; Marty G Woldorff; Ariel Schoenfeld; Tilman Hagner; Lutz Jäncke; Claus Tempelmann; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

3.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Does attention affect visual feature integration?

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; D E Presti; M I Posner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J D St James
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

6.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  J Moran; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The effect of increasing age on the latency for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Carter; L Obler; S Woodward; M L Albert
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1983-05

8.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner; J A Walker; F J Friedrich; R D Rafal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  20 in total

1.  Specificity of the effect of a nicotinic receptor polymorphism on individual differences in visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Pamela M Greenwood; John A Fossella; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on visuospatial attention dissipates after age 80.

Authors:  Selam Negash; Pamela M Greenwood; Trey Sunderland; Raja Parasuraman; Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Ronald C Petersen; Glenn E Smith
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  The response-signal method reveals age-related changes in object working memory.

Authors:  Arjun Kumar; Brian C Rakitin; Rohit Nambisan; Christian Habeck; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-06

5.  A search-by-clusters model of visual search: fits to data from younger and older adults.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; John Cerella; Norbou G Buchler
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Spatial distribution of attentional inhibition is not altered in healthy aging.

Authors:  Linda K Langley; Nora D Gayzur; Alyson L Saville; Shanna L Morlock; Angela G Bagne
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  How Attention Affects Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Antoine Barbot
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-05-06

8.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Individual differences in reasoning and visuospatial attention are associated with prefrontal and parietal white matter tracts in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Zachary A Monge; Pamela M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman; Maren Strenziok
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Executive function and attention are preserved in older surgically menopausal monkeys receiving estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone.

Authors:  Mary Lou Voytko; Rhonda Murray; Casey J Higgs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.