Literature DB >> 11309485

Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

M Carrasco1, B McElree.   

Abstract

Whenever we open our eyes, we are confronted with an overwhelming amount of visual information. Covert attention allows us to select visual information at a cued location, without eye movements, and to grant such information priority in processing. Covert attention can be voluntarily allocated, to a given location according to goals, or involuntarily allocated, in a reflexive manner, to a cue that appears suddenly in the visual field. Covert attention improves discriminability in a wide variety of visual tasks. An important unresolved issue is whether covert attention can also speed the rate at which information is processed. To address this issue, it is necessary to obtain conjoint measures of the effects of covert attention on discriminability and rate of information processing. We used the response-signal speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) procedure to derive measures of how cueing a target location affects speed and accuracy in a visual search task. Here, we show that covert attention not only improves discriminability but also accelerates the rate of information processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11309485      PMCID: PMC33215          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.081074098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C Penpeci-Talgar; M Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Visual prior entry.

Authors:  D I Shore; C Spence; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

4.  Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.

Authors:  A V Reed
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms.

Authors:  Z L Lu; B A Dosher
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention.

Authors:  A Martínez; L Anllo-Vento; M I Sereno; L R Frank; R B Buxton; D J Dubowitz; E C Wong; H Hinrichs; H J Heinze; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A W Inhoff; R E Morrison; M L Slowiaczek; J H Bertera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  106 in total

1.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Brian McElree; Kristina Denisova; Anna Marie Giordano
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Sam Ling; Sarah Read
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention.

Authors:  Niko A Busch; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Population response profiles in early visual cortex are biased in favor of more valuable stimuli.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Perceived temporal asynchrony between sinusoidally modulated luminance and depth.

Authors:  Gojko Žaric; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Shigeaki Nishina; Peter De Weerd; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Short-term memory for scenes with affective content.

Authors:  Vera Maljkovic; Paolo Martini
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect.

Authors:  Anina N Rich; Melina A Kunar; Michael J Van Wert; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Improving visual perception through neurofeedback.

Authors:  Frank Scharnowski; Chloe Hutton; Oliver Josephs; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.