Literature DB >> 10535106

Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes.

J E Scheib1, S W Gangestad, R Thornhill.   

Abstract

Cues of phenotypic condition should be among those used by women in their choice of mates. One marker of better phenotypic condition is thought to be symmetrical bilateral body and facial features. However, it is not clear whether women use symmetry as the primary cue in assessing the phenotypic quality of potential mates or whether symmetry is correlated with other facial markers affecting physical attractiveness. Using photographs of men's faces, for which facial symmetry had been measured, we found a relationship between women's attractiveness ratings of these faces and symmetry, but the subjects could not rate facial symmetry accurately. Moreover, the relationship between facial attractiveness and symmetry was still observed, even when symmetry cues were removed by presenting only the left or right half of faces. These results suggest that attractive features other than symmetry can be used to assess phenotypic condition. We identified one such cue, facial masculinity (cheek-bone prominence and a relatively longer lower face), which was related to both symmetry and full- and half-face attractiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10535106      PMCID: PMC1690211          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference.

Authors:  I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett; D L Castles; T Kobayashi; D M Burt; L K Murray; R Minamisawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.

Authors:  D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  The heritability of fluctuating asymmetry and the genetic control of developmental stability.

Authors:  M Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Developmental stability, disease and medicine.

Authors:  R Thornhill; A P Møller
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1997-11

6.  Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness.

Authors:  A Rikowski; K Grammer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness.

Authors:  M R Cunningham; A P Barbee; C L Pike
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-07

8.  Developmental stability and human violence.

Authors:  B Furlow; S W Gangestad; T Armijo-Prewitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics.

Authors:  J A Simpson; S W Gangestad; P N Christensen; K Leck
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

10.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness.

Authors:  K Grammer; R Thornhill
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  73 in total

1.  Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Janelle Chan; Leslie A Zebrowitz; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A feature-based model of symmetry detection.

Authors:  Renata Scognamillo; Gillian Rhodes; Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry.

Authors:  Nicole Koehler; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes; Marianne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Reproductive strategy, sexual development and attraction to facial characteristics.

Authors:  R Elisabeth Cornwell; Miriam J Law Smith; Lynda G Boothroyd; Fhionna R Moore; Hasker P Davis; Michael Stirrat; Bernard Tiddeman; David I Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  [Facial aesthetics part I - the significance of the triangle of yarbus].

Authors:  Ingo N Springer; Oliver Zernial; Jörg Wiltfang; Patrick H Warnke; Hendrik Terheyden; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-08

7.  Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Joann M Montepare
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2008-05-01

Review 8.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Can we understand modern humans without considering pathogens?

Authors:  Frédéric Thomas; Simon P Daoust; Michel Raymond
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.