Literature DB >> 17118929

Reproductive strategy, sexual development and attraction to facial characteristics.

R Elisabeth Cornwell1, Miriam J Law Smith, Lynda G Boothroyd, Fhionna R Moore, Hasker P Davis, Michael Stirrat, Bernard Tiddeman, David I Perrett.   

Abstract

Sexual reproduction strategies vary both between and within species in the level of investment in offspring. Life-history theories suggest that the rate of sexual maturation is critically linked to reproductive strategy, with high investment being associated with few offspring and delayed maturation. For humans, age of puberty and age of first sex are two developmental milestones that have been associated with reproductive strategies. Stress during early development can retard or accelerate sexual maturation and reproduction. Early age of menarche is associated with absence of younger siblings, absence of a father figure during early life and increased weight. Father absence during early life is also associated with early marriage, pregnancy and divorce. Choice of partner characteristics is critical to successful implementation of sexual strategies. It has been suggested that sexually dimorphic traits (including those evident in the face) signal high-quality immune function and reproductive status. Masculinity in males has also been associated with low investment in mate and offspring. Thus, women's reproductive strategy should be matched to the probability of male investment, hence to male masculinity. Our review leads us to predict associations between the rate of sexual maturation and adult preferences for facial characteristics (enhanced sexual dimorphism and attractiveness). We find for men, engaging in sex at an early age is related to an increased preference for feminized female faces. Similarly, for women, the earlier the age of first sex the greater the preference for masculinity in opposite-sex faces. When we controlled sexual dimorphism in male faces, the speed of sexual development in women was not associated with differences in preference for male facial attractiveness. These developmental influences on partner choice were not mediated by self-rated attractiveness or parental relationships. We conclude that individuals assort in preferences based on the rapidity of their sexual development. Fast developing individuals prefer opposite-sex partners with an increased level of sexually dimorphic facial characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118929      PMCID: PMC1764838          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  47 in total

1.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Sexual behaviour and early coitarche in a national sample of 17-year-old Swedish boys.

Authors:  K Edgardh
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 3.  Testosterone and dominance in men.

Authors:  A Mazur; A Booth
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Male testosterone linked to high social dominance but low physical aggression in early adolescence.

Authors:  B Schaal; R E Tremblay; R Soussignan; E J Susman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  Life history theory and human reproductive behavior : Environmental/contextual influences and heritable variation.

Authors:  K MacDonald
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1997-12

6.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Parent-daughter transmission of the androgen receptor gene as an explanation of the effect of father absence on age of menarche.

Authors:  David E Comings; Donn Muhleman; James P Johnson; James P MacMurray
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

8.  Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males.

Authors:  John P Swaddle; Gillian W Reierson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Developmental processes in early adolescence. Relations among chronologic age, pubertal stage, height, weight, and serum levels of gonadotropins, sex steroids, and adrenal androgens.

Authors:  E D Nottelmann; E J Susman; L D Dorn; G Inoff-Germain; D L Loriaux; G B Cutler; G P Chrousos
Journal:  J Adolesc Health Care       Date:  1987-05

Review 10.  Current evolutionary perspectives on adolescent romantic relations and sexuality.

Authors:  Glenn E Weisfeld; Laura Woodward
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.829

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for face identity and face emotion processing in animals.

Authors:  Andrew J Tate; Hanno Fischer; Andrea E Leigh; Keith M Kendrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Introduction. The neurobiology of social recognition, attraction and bonding.

Authors:  Keith M Kendrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolving attractive faces using morphing technology and a genetic algorithm: a new approach to determining ideal facial aesthetics.

Authors:  Brian J F Wong; Koohyar Karimi; Zlatko Devcic; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Developmental influences on fertility decisions by women: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  D A Coall; M Tickner; L S McAllister; P Sheppard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effects of Male Facial Masculinity on Perceived Attractiveness.

Authors:  Omid Ekrami; Peter Claes; Mark D Shriver; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Susan Walsh; Stefan Van Dongen
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-11-12

6.  Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive.

Authors:  José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes; Marta Iglesias-Julios; Miguel Pita; Enrique Turiegano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceptual and Social Attributes Underlining Age-Related Preferences for Faces.

Authors:  Hanni S M Kiiski; Brendan Cullen; Sarah L Clavin; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  After the Honeymoon: Neural and Genetic Correlates of Romantic Love in Newlywed Marriages.

Authors:  Bianca P Acevedo; Michael J Poulin; Nancy L Collins; Lucy L Brown
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-07

9.  Association of Frontal and Lateral Facial Attractiveness.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Gu; David Avilla; Zlatko Devcic; Koohyar Karimi; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

10.  A new data-driven mathematical model dissociates attractiveness from sexual dimorphism of human faces.

Authors:  Koyo Nakamura; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.