Literature DB >> 2213490

What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness.

M R Cunningham1, A P Barbee, C L Pike.   

Abstract

The multiple motive hypothesis of physical attractiveness suggests that women are attracted to men whose appearances elicit their nurturant feelings, who appear to possess sexual maturity and dominance characteristics, who seem sociable, approacheable, and of high social status. Those multiple motives may cause people to be attracted to individuals who display an optimal combination of neotenous, mature, and expressive facial features, plus desirable grooming attributes. Three quasi-experiments demonstrated that men who possessed the neotenous features of large eyes, the mature features of prominent cheekbones and a large chin, the expressive feature of a big smile, and high-status clothing were seen as more attractive than other men. Further supporting the multiple motive hypothesis, the 2nd and 3rd studies indicated that impressions of attractiveness had strong relations with selections of men to date and to marry but had a curvilinear relation with perceptions of a baby face vs. a mature face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2213490     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  54 in total

1.  It's not just average faces that are attractive: computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive.

Authors:  Jamin Halberstadt; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Anthony C Little; Lynda G Boothroyd; David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Philip A Cooper; Lars Penke; David R Feinberg; Bernard P Tiddeman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Stabilizing and directional selection on facial paedomorphosis : Averageness or juvenilization?

Authors:  P Wehr; K MacDonald; R Lindner; G Yeung
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2001-12

5.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  Is it possible to define the ideal lips?

Authors:  M Kar; N B Muluk; S A Bafaqeeh; C Cingi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Sexual selection and physical attractiveness : Implications for mating dynamics.

Authors:  S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

8.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Human facial beauty : Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance.

Authors:  R Thornhill; S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

10.  Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans.

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Nicholas Pound; Ian D Stephen; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.