Literature DB >> 15252993

The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry.

Nicole Koehler1, Leigh W Simmons, Gillian Rhodes, Marianne Peters.   

Abstract

Previous studies have found both support and lack of support for a positive relationship between masculinity and symmetry, two putative signs of mate quality, in male faces. We re-examined this relationship using an explicit measure of facial fluctuating asymmetry, as well as other measures of asymmetry, and measures of facial masculinity/femininity. We also used ratings of these traits for faces. Further, we examined the relationship between facial sexual dimorphism and body asymmetry. We found no significant correlations between facial masculinity and any of our measures of asymmetry or ratings of symmetry in males. Facial femininity was not consistently associated with facial symmetry in females, but was associated with body symmetry. Therefore, for females, but not males, facial femininity and body symmetry may reflect similar aspects of mate quality. We also examined the relationships between trait ratings and measurements. Our results provide validation of our ability to measure aspects of asymmetry that are perceived to be symmetrical, and aspects of sexual dimorphism that are perceived as feminine in females and masculine in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15252993      PMCID: PMC1810020          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  5 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  A latent variable model of developmental instability in relation to men's sexual behaviour.

Authors:  S W Gangestad; K L Bennett; R Thornhill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes.

Authors:  J E Scheib; S W Gangestad; R Thornhill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness.

Authors:  I S Penton-Voak; B C Jones; A C Little; S Baker; B Tiddeman; D M Burt; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness.

Authors:  K Grammer; R Thornhill
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.231

  5 in total
  17 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Peter Claes; Mark Walters; Mark D Shriver; David Puts; Greg Gibson; John Clement; Gareth Baynam; Geert Verbeke; Dirk Vandermeulen; Paul Suetens
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics.

Authors:  William M Brown; Michael E Price; Jinsheng Kang; Nicholas Pound; Yue Zhao; Hui Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Dimorphism in Human Facial Morphology: A Multi-Variate Study.

Authors:  Omid Ekrami; Peter Claes; Ellen Van Assche; Mark D Shriver; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Susan Walsh; Stefan Van Dongen
Journal:  Symmetry (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.713

4.  Effects of Male Facial Masculinity on Perceived Attractiveness.

Authors:  Omid Ekrami; Peter Claes; Mark D Shriver; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Susan Walsh; Stefan Van Dongen
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-11-12

5.  Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Amanda E Keyes; Catherine J Mondloch; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Perceived Gender Ratings for High and Low Scorers on the Autism-Spectrum Quotient Consistent with the Extreme Male Brain Account of Autism.

Authors:  Diana Weiting Tan; Suzanna N Russell-Smith; Jessica M Simons; Murray T Maybery; Doris Leung; Honey L H Ng; Andrew J O Whitehouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies.

Authors:  Marianne Peters; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Geographic variation in chin shape challenges the universal facial attractiveness hypothesis.

Authors:  Zaneta M Thayer; Seth D Dobson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Corri Waitt; Bernard P Tiddeman; David R Feinberg; David I Perrett; Coren L Apicella; Frank W Marlowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.