Literature DB >> 10452380

Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants.

B E Pfingst1, L A Holloway, T A Zwolan, L M Collins.   

Abstract

Effects of stimulus level on discrimination of one stimulation site from another were examined in 15 human subjects with Nucleus-22 cochlear implant systems. Bipolar stimulation was used in all cases with electrodes in the bipolar pair separated by 1.5 mm (center to center). Subjects were first tested at a medium loudness level, using an adaptive tracking procedure, to determine the regions of the electrode array where electrode-place discrimination was best and the regions where it was poorest. Electrode-place discrimination was then tested at three regions distributed throughout the array, which included the regions of best and poorest discrimination. At each region, electrode-place discrimination was tested at three levels: 25%, 50%, and 75% of the dynamic range. For each of these nine conditions (3 sites x 3 levels), the test-electrode pairs were loudness balanced with the reference-electrode pairs. A two-interval forced-choice same-different procedure was then used to determine discriminability of the reference-electrode pair from the nearest, apical, test-electrode pair. If P(C)max was <0.707 at all three levels, additional testing was done using the next, more apical, electrode pair as the test-electrode pair. A tendency toward better discrimination at more apical regions of the array was observed. Electrode pairs with poor discrimination typically had smaller dynamic ranges than those with good discrimination. There was a weak tendency toward better discrimination at higher levels of stimulation. However, effects of level on electrode-place discrimination were less pronounced and less consistent than previously observed effects of level on temporal discriminations. These results suggest interactions between current spread and the condition of the implanted cochlea as underlying mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10452380     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00079-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  16 in total

1.  Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-27

Review 2.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-16

4.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

5.  Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

10.  A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Jian Yu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.