Literature DB >> 10420621

Wideband reflectance tympanometry in normal adults.

R H Margolis1, G L Saly, D H Keefe.   

Abstract

Acoustic impedance/reflectance measurements were made at various ear-canal pressures in 20 subjects with a clinical acoustic immittance instrument and an experimental impedance/reflectance system. Measurements were made over a frequency range of 226-2000 Hz with the clinical system and 125-11,310 Hz with the experimental system. For frequencies < or = 2.0 kHz, tympanograms obtained with the two systems are similar, with patterns that progress through the same orderly sequence with increasing frequency. Eardrum impedance measurements were also similar. There are small gender differences in middle-ear impedance. Reflectance patterns (reflectance versus frequency) at ambient ear-canal air pressure are characterized by high reflectance at low frequencies, two district minima at 1.2 and 3.5 kHz, increasing reflectance to 8.0 kHz, and decreasing reflectance above that frequency. Ear-canal pressure increases reflectance at low frequencies, decreases reflectance in the region of the minimum, and increases reflectance slightly at high frequencies. Reflectance tympanograms (reflectance versus ear-canal pressure) progress through a sequence of three patterns. At low frequencies, reflectance tympanograms are "V" shaped, indicating that pressure increases reflectance. At frequencies near the minimum reflectance, the pattern inverts, indicating that pressure decreases reflectance. At high frequencies, the patterns are flat, indicating that ear-canal pressure has little effect. Results presented for one patient suggest that reflectance tympanometry may be useful for detecting middle-ear pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10420621     DOI: 10.1121/1.427055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility of laser-Doppler vibrometry in conductive hearing loss with normal tympanic membrane.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Ritvik P Mehta; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Wideband absorbance tympanometry using pressure sweeps: system development and results on adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An analysis of the acoustic input impedance of the ear.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Lauren E Gowdy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-06

6.  Normative Wideband Reflectance, Equivalent Admittance at the Tympanic Membrane, and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Threshold in Adults.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Optoelectronic holographic otoscope for measurement of nano-displacements in tympanic membranes.

Authors:  Maria Del Socorro Hernández-Montes; Cosme Furlong; John J Rosowski; Nesim Hulli; Ellery Harrington; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; Fernando Mendoza Santoyo
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Wideband aural acoustic absorbance predicts conductive hearing loss in children.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.