Literature DB >> 28045835

Normative Wideband Reflectance, Equivalent Admittance at the Tympanic Membrane, and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Threshold in Adults.

M Patrick Feeney1, Douglas H Keefe, Lisa L Hunter, Denis F Fitzpatrick, Angela C Garinis, Daniel B Putterman, Garnett P McMillan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) measures such as pressure reflectance, parameterized by absorbance and group delay, equivalent admittance at the tympanic membrane (TM), and acoustic stapedius reflex threshold (ASRT) describe middle ear function across a wide frequency range, compared with traditional tests employing a single frequency. The objective of this study was to obtain normative data using these tests for a group of normal-hearing adults and investigate test-retest reliability using a longitudinal design.
DESIGN: A longitudinal prospective design was used to obtain normative test and retest data on clinical and WAI measures. Subjects were 13 males and 20 females (mean age = 26 years). Inclusion criteria included normal audiometry and clinical immittance. Subjects were tested on two separate visits approximately 1 month apart. Reflectance and equivalent admittance at the TM were measured from 0.25 to 8.0 kHz under three conditions: at ambient pressure in the ear canal and with pressure sweeps from positive to negative pressure (downswept) and negative to positive pressure (upswept). Equivalent admittance at the TM was calculated using admittance measurements at the probe tip that were adjusted using a model of sound transmission in the ear canal and acoustic estimates of ear-canal area and length. Wideband ASRTs were measured at tympanometric peak pressure (TPP) derived from the average TPP of downswept and upswept tympanograms. Descriptive statistics were obtained for all WAI responses, and wideband and clinical ASRTs were compared.
RESULTS: Mean absorbance at ambient pressure and TPP demonstrated a broad band-pass pattern typical of previous studies. Test-retest differences were lower for absorbance at TPP for the downswept method compared with ambient pressure at frequencies between 1.0 and 1.26 kHz. Mean tympanometric peak-to-tail differences for absorbance were greatest around 1.0 to 2.0 kHz and similar for positive and negative tails. Mean group delay at ambient pressure and at TPP were greatest between 0.32 and 0.6 kHz at 200 to 300 μsec, reduced at frequencies between 0.8 and 1.5 kHz, and increased above 1.5 kHz to around 150 μsec. Mean equivalent admittance at the TM had a lower level for the ambient method than at TPP for both sweep directions below 1.2 kHz, but the difference between methods was only statistically significant for the comparison between the ambient method and TPP for the upswept tympanogram. Mean equivalent admittance phase was positive at all frequencies. Test-retest reliability of the equivalent admittance level ranged from 1 to 3 dB at frequencies below 1.0 kHz, but increased to 8 to 9 dB at higher frequencies. The mean wideband ASRT for an ipsilateral broadband noise activator was 12 dB lower than the clinical ASRT, but had poorer reliability.
CONCLUSIONS: Normative data for the WAI test battery revealed minor differences for results at ambient pressure compared with tympanometric methods at TPP for reflectance, group delay, and equivalent admittance level at the TM for subjects with middle ear pressure within ±100 daPa. Test-retest reliability was better for absorbance at TPP for the downswept tympanogram compared with ambient pressure at frequencies around 1.0 kHz. Large peak-to-tail differences in absorbance combined with good reliability at frequencies between about 0.7 and 3.0 kHz suggest that this may be a sensitive frequency range for interpreting absorbance at TPP. The mean wideband ipsilateral ASRT was lower than the clinical ASRT, consistent with previous studies. Results are promising for the use of a wideband test battery to evaluate middle ear function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28045835      PMCID: PMC5404939          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  43 in total

1.  Estimating the acoustic reflex threshold from wideband measures of reflectance, admittance, and power.

Authors:  M P Feeney; D H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Age effects in the human middle ear: wideband acoustical measures.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Chris A Sanford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Wideband absorbance tympanometry using pressure sweeps: system development and results on adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Consensus statement: Eriksholm workshop on wideband absorbance measures of the middle ear.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Joseph Kei; David J Lilly; Robert H Margolis; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Stephen T Neely; Beth A Prieve; John J Rosowski; Chris A Sanford; Kim S Schairer; Navid Shahnaz; Stefan Stenfelt; Susan E Voss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Wideband acoustic immittance normative data: ethnicity, gender, aging, and instrumentation.

Authors:  Navid Shahnaz; M Patrick Feeney; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Ear-canal reflectance, umbo velocity, and tympanometry in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Hideko H Nakajima; Mohamad A Hamade; Lorice Mahfoud; Gabrielle R Merchant; Christopher F Halpin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Wideband acoustic-reflex test in a test battery to predict middle-ear dysfunction.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Denis Fitzpatrick; Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of maturation on tympanometric wideband acoustic transfer functions in human infants.

Authors:  Chris A Sanford; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  26 in total

1.  Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan; Jeffrey A Gold; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  ADANO recommendations for the selection of target parameters and measurement processes for the use of auditory evoked potentials, otoacoustic emissions, and impedance audiometry in clinical trials : Prepared by the ERA consortium (AG-ERA)* of ADANO#. Confirmed by the board of ADANO on 18.01.2019.

Authors:  T Rahne; O Dziemba; A Lodwig; D Polterauer; R Thie; M Walger; T Wesarg; S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

5.  Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Rapid imaging of tympanic membrane vibrations in humans.

Authors:  Matan Hamra; Shadi Shinnawi; Mauricio Cohen Vaizer; Dvir Yelin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chris A Sanford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel B Putterman; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Angela C Garinis; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Garnett P McMillan; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.