Literature DB >> 17902852

Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Michael E Ravicz1, Elizabeth S Olson, John J Rosowski.   

Abstract

Sound pressure was mapped in the bony ear canal of gerbils during closed-field sound stimulation at frequencies from 0.1 to 80 kHz. A 1.27-mm-diam probe-tube microphone or a 0.17-mm-diam fiber-optic miniature microphone was positioned along approximately longitudinal trajectories within the 2.3-mm-diam ear canal. Substantial spatial variations in sound pressure, sharp minima in magnitude, and half-cycle phase changes occurred at frequencies >30 kHz. The sound frequencies of these transitions increased with decreasing distance from the tympanic membrane (TM). Sound pressure measured orthogonally across the surface of the TM showed only small variations at frequencies below 60 kHz. Hence, the ear canal sound field can be described fairly well as a one-dimensional standing wave pattern. Ear-canal power reflectance estimated from longitudinal spatial variations was roughly constant at 0.2-0.5 at frequencies between 30 and 45 kHz. In contrast, reflectance increased at higher frequencies to at least 0.8 above 60 kHz. Sound pressure was also mapped in a microphone-terminated uniform tube-an "artificial ear." Comparison with ear canal sound fields suggests that an artificial ear or "artificial cavity calibration" technique may underestimate the in situ sound pressure by 5-15 dB between 40 and 60 kHz.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17902852      PMCID: PMC2302835          DOI: 10.1121/1.2769625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Basilar membrane vibration in the basal turn of the sensitive gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  T Ren; A L Nuttall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A reconsideration of sound calibration in the mouse.

Authors:  M Pearce; C P Richter; M A Cheatham
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A noninvasive method for estimating acoustic admittance at the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  G T Huang; J J Rosowski; S Puria; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  High-frequency sensitivity of the mature gerbil cochlea and its development.

Authors:  Edward H Overstreet; Claus-Peter Richter; Andrei N Temchin; Mary Ann Cheatham; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  The roles of the external, middle, and inner ears in determining the bandwidth of hearing.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tympanic membrane vibrations in cats studied by time-averaged holography.

Authors:  S M Khanna; J Tonndorf
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The anatomy, physiology, functional significance and evolution of specialized hearing organs of gerbilline rodents.

Authors:  D M Lay
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 1.804

9.  Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and human.

Authors:  R H Margolis; S Paul; G L Saly; P A Schachern; D H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Development of wide-band middle ear transmission in the Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  Edward H Overstreet; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  19 in total

1.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  A study of sound transmission in an abstract middle ear using physical and finite element models.

Authors:  Antonio Gonzalez-Herrera; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Gerbil middle-ear sound transmission from 100 Hz to 60 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Nigel P Cooper; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Simultaneous measurements of ossicular velocity and intracochlear pressure leading to the cochlear input impedance in gerbil.

Authors:  O de la Rochefoucauld; W F Decraemer; S M Khanna; E S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-06

5.  Basilar membrane velocity in a cochlea with a modified organ of Corti.

Authors:  N Eze; E S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The Effect of Ear Canal Orientation on Tympanic Membrane Motion and the Sound Field Near the Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Michael Ravicz; Jérémie Guignard; Cosme Furlong; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-25

7.  Sound pressure distribution within natural and artificial human ear canals: forward stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Hearing abilities at ultra-high frequency in patients with tinnitus.

Authors:  Hyun Joon Shim; Sun Ki Kim; Chul Ho Park; Sung Hee Lee; Sang Won Yoon; A Ram Ki; Dae Han Chung; Seung Geun Yeo
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.