Literature DB >> 10385630

Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation.

S M Burgess1, N Kleckner, B M Weiner.   

Abstract

FISH analysis of well-spread chromosomes reveals that homologs are paired in vegetatively growing budding yeast diploid cells, via multiple interstitial interactions, and independent of recA homologs and mating type heterozygosity. Pairing is present during G1 and G2, and in cells arrested at G1 by mating pheromone, but is disrupted during S phase. Thus, somatic pairing is qualitatively analogous to premeiotic and early meiotic pairing. S-phase pairing disruption occurs by a complex intranuclear program involving regional, nucleus-wide, and temporal determinants. Pairing is also disrupted in two G2-arrest conditions (cdc13ts and nocodazole). Together these findings suggest that cell cycle signals may provoke pairing disruption by modulating underlying chromosome and/or chromatin structure. Whether the cell chooses to disrupt pairing contacts or not (e.g., S phase and G2 arrest, but not G1 arrest or normal G1 or G2), could be dictated by functional considerations involving homolog/sister discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10385630      PMCID: PMC316803          DOI: 10.1101/gad.13.12.1627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  52 in total

1.  Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L C Kadyk; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Analysis of a circular derivative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III: a physical map and identification and location of ARS elements.

Authors:  C S Newlon; L R Lipchitz; I Collins; A Deshpande; R J Devenish; R P Green; H L Klein; T G Palzkill; R B Ren; S Synn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Segregation of recombinant chromatids following mitotic crossing over in yeast.

Authors:  P Chua; S Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Somatic pairing, reduction and recombination: an evolutionary hypothesis of meiosis.

Authors:  S M Stack; W V Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast.

Authors:  B M Weiner; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The nucleotide sequence of the HIS4 region of yeast.

Authors:  T F Donahue; P J Farabaugh; G R Fink
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Somatic pairing of centromeres and short arms of chromosome 15 in the hematopoietic and lymphoid system.

Authors:  J P Lewis; H J Tanke; A K Raap; G C Beverstock; H C Kluin-Nelemans
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint.

Authors:  T A Weinert; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast.

Authors:  V Guacci; E Hogan; D Koshland
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast.

Authors:  J Loidl; F Klein; H Scherthan
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Higher levels of organization in the interphase nucleus of cycling and differentiated cells.

Authors:  A R Leitch
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization.

Authors:  S M Burgess; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts.

Authors:  Tamara L Peoples; Eric Dean; Oscar Gonzalez; Lindsey Lambourne; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells.

Authors:  Alexander Lorenz; Jörg Fuchs; Reinhard Bürger; Josef Loidl
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2003-10

5.  Long-range interphase chromosome organization in Drosophila: a study using color barcoded fluorescence in situ hybridization and structural clustering analysis.

Authors:  Michael G Lowenstein; Thomas D Goddard; John W Sedat
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Compartmentalization of the yeast meiotic nucleus revealed by analysis of ectopic recombination.

Authors:  Hélène B Schlecht; Michael Lichten; Alastair S H Goldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Multiple branches of the meiotic recombination pathway contribute independently to homolog pairing and stable juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast.

Authors:  Tamara L Peoples-Holst; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Sequence-dependent DNA condensation as a driving force of DNA phase separation.

Authors:  Hyunju Kang; Jejoong Yoo; Byeong-Kwon Sohn; Seung-Won Lee; Hong Soo Lee; Wenjie Ma; Jung-Min Kee; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Hajin Kim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Chromosome territory arrangement and homologous pairing in nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana are predominantly random except for NOR-bearing chromosomes.

Authors:  Ales Pecinka; Veit Schubert; Armin Meister; Gregor Kreth; Marco Klatte; Martin A Lysak; Jörg Fuchs; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Protein-mediated chromosome pairing of repetitive arrays.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Frederick S Chang; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.