Literature DB >> 8514150

Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint.

T A Weinert1, L H Hartwell.   

Abstract

In eucaryotes a cell cycle control called a checkpoint ensures that mitosis occurs only after chromosomes are completely replicated and any damage is repaired. The function of this checkpoint in budding yeast requires the RAD9 gene. Here we examine the role of the RAD9 gene in the arrest of the 12 cell division cycle (cdc) mutants, temperature-sensitive lethal mutants that arrest in specific phases of the cell cycle at a restrictive temperature. We found that in four cdc mutants the cdc rad9 cells failed to arrest after a shift to the restrictive temperature, rather they continued cell division and died rapidly, whereas the cdc RAD cells arrested and remained viable. The cell cycle and genetic phenotypes of the 12 cdc RAD mutants indicate the function of the RAD9 checkpoint is phase-specific and signal-specific. First, the four cdc RAD mutants that required RAD9 each arrested in the late S/G2 phase after a shift to the restrictive temperature when DNA replication was complete or nearly complete, and second, each leaves DNA lesions when the CDC gene product is limiting for cell division. Three of the four CDC genes are known to encode DNA replication enzymes. We found that the RAD17 gene is also essential for the function of the RAD9 checkpoint because it is required for phase-specific arrest of the same four cdc mutants. We also show that both X- or UV-irradiated cells require the RAD9 and RAD17 genes for delay in the G2 phase. Together, these results indicate that the RAD9 checkpoint is apparently activated only by DNA lesions and arrests cell division only in the late S/G2 phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8514150      PMCID: PMC1205445     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  44 in total

1.  A forespore checkpoint for mother cell gene expression during development in B. subtilis.

Authors:  S Cutting; V Oke; A Driks; R Losick; S Lu; L Kroos
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-07-27       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Mutation of fission yeast cell cycle control genes abolishes dependence of mitosis on DNA replication.

Authors:  T Enoch; P Nurse
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  A yeast gene essential for regulation of spindle pole duplication.

Authors:  P Baum; C Yip; L Goetsch; B Byers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Spindle formation and chromatin condensation in cells blocked at interphase by mutation of a negative cell cycle control gene.

Authors:  S A Osmani; D B Engle; J H Doonan; N R Morris
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-01-29       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Isolation of the gene encoding yeast DNA polymerase I.

Authors:  L M Johnson; M Snyder; L M Chang; R W Davis; J L Campbell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Thymidine utilization by tut mutants and facile cloning of mutant alleles by plasmid conversion in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  R A Sclafani; W L Fangman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A cold-sensitive mRNA splicing mutant is a member of the RNA helicase gene family.

Authors:  E J Strauss; C Guthrie
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  S-phase feedback control in budding yeast independent of tyrosine phosphorylation of p34cdc28.

Authors:  P K Sorger; A W Murray
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  DNA polymerase III, a second essential DNA polymerase, is encoded by the S. cerevisiae CDC2 gene.

Authors:  K C Sitney; M E Budd; J L Campbell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-02-24       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The CHL 1 (CTF 1) gene product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is important for chromosome transmission and normal cell cycle progression in G2/M.

Authors:  S L Gerring; F Spencer; P Hieter
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  128 in total

1.  Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation.

Authors:  S M Burgess; N Kleckner; B M Weiner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Association of Chk1 with 14-3-3 proteins is stimulated by DNA damage.

Authors:  L Chen; T H Liu; N C Walworth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo.

Authors:  J A Melo; J Cohen; D P Toczyski
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway.

Authors:  V Paciotti; M Clerici; M Scotti; G Lucchini; M P Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Pds1 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage is essential for its DNA damage checkpoint function.

Authors:  H Wang; D Liu; Y Wang; J Qin; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Silent repair accounts for cell cycle specificity in the signaling of oxidative DNA lesions.

Authors:  C Leroy; C Mann; M C Marsolier
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.

Authors:  R Gardner; C W Putnam; T Weinert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Induction of endocycles represses apoptosis independently of differentiation and predisposes cells to genome instability.

Authors:  Christiane Hassel; Bingqing Zhang; Michael Dixon; Brian R Calvi
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Contrasting roles of checkpoint proteins as recombination modulators at Fob1-Ter complexes with or without fork arrest.

Authors:  Bidyut K Mohanty; Narendra K Bairwa; Deepak Bastia
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.