Literature DB >> 14555468

Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells.

Alexander Lorenz1, Jörg Fuchs, Reinhard Bürger, Josef Loidl.   

Abstract

There are several reports of a closer-than-random colocalization of homologous chromosomes in the vegetative nuclei of diploid budding yeast. Here, we studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) the nuclear distribution of chromosomes and found a slight tendency toward closer proximity between homologous (allelic) loci than between any nonhomologous chromosomal regions. We show that most of this preferential association is not due to vegetative (also known as somatic) pairing but is caused by the polar orientation of interphase chromosomes (Rabl orientation). We quantified the occasional loss of detectable fluorescence signals that is inherent to the FISH method. Signal loss leads to the occurrence of a single signal that may be misinterpreted as the close association of two homologous chromosomal sites. The nuclear distribution of homologous loci, when corrected for the influence of nuclear architecture and methodological faults, was not different or was only marginally different from a random relative positioning as predicted by computer simulation. We discuss here several possibilities for the residual homologous proximity that do not invoke homology-dependent vegetative pairing, and we conclude that, in diploid budding yeast, constitutive vegetative pairing is a negligible factor for the organization of the interphase nucleus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14555468      PMCID: PMC219365          DOI: 10.1128/EC.2.5.856-866.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eukaryot Cell        ISSN: 1535-9786


  42 in total

1.  Homolog pairing and meiotic progression in Coprinus cinereus.

Authors:  L Li; E E Gerecke; M E Zolan
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation.

Authors:  S M Burgess; N Kleckner; B M Weiner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization.

Authors:  S M Burgess; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Transvection and other homology effects.

Authors:  C T Wu; J R Morris
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts.

Authors:  Tamara L Peoples; Eric Dean; Oscar Gonzalez; Lindsey Lambourne; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  Trans-sensing effects: the ups and downs of being together.

Authors:  S Henikoff; L Comai
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Communication between homologous chromosomes: genetic alterations at a nuclease-hypersensitive site can alter mitotic chromatin structure at that site both in cis and in trans.

Authors:  S Keeney; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization.

Authors:  Q W Jin; J Fuchs; J Loidl
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Homologous chromosome pairing in Drosophila melanogaster proceeds through multiple independent initiations.

Authors:  J C Fung; W F Marshall; A Dernburg; D A Agard; J W Sedat
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-04-06       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Yeast nuclei display prominent centromere clustering that is reduced in nondividing cells and in meiotic prophase.

Authors:  Q Jin; E Trelles-Sticken; H Scherthan; J Loidl
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-04-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation.

Authors:  Denise Zickler
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  DNA double-strand breaks, but not crossovers, are required for the reorganization of meiotic nuclei in Tetrahymena.

Authors:  Kazufumi Mochizuki; Maria Novatchkova; Josef Loidl
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Recombinational DNA repair in a cellular context: a search for the homology search.

Authors:  Allon Weiner; Nathan Zauberman; Abraham Minsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Similar rye A and B chromosome organization in meristematic and differentiated interphase nuclei.

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Armin Meister; Hisashi Tsujimoto; Takashi Ryu Endo; Andreas Houben
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Interallelic interaction and gene regulation in budding yeast.

Authors:  Daoyong Zhang; Lu Bai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Roles of Hop1 and Mek1 in meiotic chromosome pairing and recombination partner choice in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Vitaly Latypov; Maja Rothenberg; Alexander Lorenz; Guillaume Octobre; Ortansa Csutak; Elisabeth Lehmann; Josef Loidl; Jürg Kohli
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Chromosome territory arrangement and homologous pairing in nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana are predominantly random except for NOR-bearing chromosomes.

Authors:  Ales Pecinka; Veit Schubert; Armin Meister; Gregor Kreth; Marco Klatte; Martin A Lysak; Jörg Fuchs; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Examination of interchromosomal interactions in vegetatively growing diploid Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells by Cre/loxP site-specific recombination.

Authors:  Monika Molnar; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Random homologous pairing and incomplete sister chromatid alignment are common in angiosperm interphase nuclei.

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Young-Min Kim; Alexandre Berr; Jörg Fuchs; Armin Meister; Sylvia Marschner; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Multiple opposing constraints govern chromosome interactions during meiosis.

Authors:  Doris Y Lui; Cori K Cahoon; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.