Literature DB >> 10421638

Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization.

S M Burgess1, N Kleckner.   

Abstract

The relative probabilities that different pairs of chromosomal loci will collide with one another in vegetatively growing diploid yeast cells have been assessed using a genetic assay for Cre/loxP site-specific recombination. Recombination rates have been determined for 18 different pairs of loxP sites representing diverse pairs of positions within the genome. Overall, relative collision probabilities vary over an eightfold range. Within this range, a hierarchy comprising three levels of organization can be discerned. First, collisions between loci on nonhomologous chromosomes are governed by nonspecific centromere clustering. Second, a sequence is closer to allelic or nearby sequences on its homolog than to sequences on nonhomologous chromosomes, an effect most simply attributed to homolog pairing. Third, a sequence can be closer to other sequences nearby on the same chromosome than to sequences on other chromosomes. These findings provide a framework for assessing the role of chromosome disposition in cellular processes such as DNA repair and gene expression. Also the possibility is raised that genome-wide coalignment of homologs is not the fundamental raison d'etre of the somatic pairing process. We suggest instead that pairing may exist to promote juxtaposition of homologous regions within irregular genome complements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10421638      PMCID: PMC316882          DOI: 10.1101/gad.13.14.1871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  45 in total

1.  Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast.

Authors:  R Rothstein
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Trans-sensing effects: the ups and downs of being together.

Authors:  S Henikoff; L Comai
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Epigenetic phenomena in filamentous fungi: useful paradigms or repeat-induced confusion?

Authors:  E U Selker
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Suppression of crossing-over by DNA methylation in Ascobolus.

Authors:  L Maloisel; J L Rossignol
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome.

Authors:  W F Dietrich; J Miller; R Steen; M A Merchant; D Damron-Boles; Z Husain; R Dredge; M J Daly; K A Ingalls; T J O'Connor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Potential advantages of unstable interactions for pairing of chromosomes in meiotic, somatic, and premeiotic cells.

Authors:  N Kleckner; B M Weiner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1993

8.  Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C.

Authors:  F Winston; C Dollard; S L Ricupero-Hovasse
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.239

9.  Effect of donor copy number on the rate of gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C Melamed; M Kupiec
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1992-10

10.  The clustering of telomeres and colocalization with Rap1, Sir3, and Sir4 proteins in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Gotta; T Laroche; A Formenton; L Maillet; H Scherthan; S M Gasser
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Higher levels of organization in the interphase nucleus of cycling and differentiated cells.

Authors:  A R Leitch
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Coupled homologous and nonhomologous repair of a double-strand break preserves genomic integrity in mammalian cells.

Authors:  C Richardson; M Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Influences of chromosome size, gene density and nuclear position on the frequency of constitutional translocations in the human population.

Authors:  Wendy A Bickmore; Peter Teague
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts.

Authors:  Tamara L Peoples; Eric Dean; Oscar Gonzalez; Lindsey Lambourne; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells.

Authors:  Alexander Lorenz; Jörg Fuchs; Reinhard Bürger; Josef Loidl
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2003-10

6.  Compartmentalization of the yeast meiotic nucleus revealed by analysis of ectopic recombination.

Authors:  Hélène B Schlecht; Michael Lichten; Alastair S H Goldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Multiple branches of the meiotic recombination pathway contribute independently to homolog pairing and stable juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast.

Authors:  Tamara L Peoples-Holst; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation.

Authors:  Denise Zickler
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Transcription of a donor enhances its use during double-strand break-induced gene conversion in human cells.

Authors:  Ezra Schildkraut; Cheryl A Miller; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Protein-mediated chromosome pairing of repetitive arrays.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Frederick S Chang; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.