Literature DB >> 8207053

Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast.

J Loidl1, F Klein, H Scherthan.   

Abstract

In situ hybridization was used to examine chromosome behavior at meiotic prophase in the rad50S, hop1, rad50, and spo11 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which are defective in chromosome synapsis and meiotic recombination. Painting of chromosomes I and III revealed that chromosome condensation and pairing are reduced in these mutants. However, there is some residual pairing in meiosis, suggesting that homologue recognition is independent of synaptonemal complex formation and recombination. Association of homologues was observed in the rad50, rad50S, and spo11 mutants, which are defective in the formation or processing of meiotic double-strand breaks. This indicates that double-strand breaks are not an essential component of the meiotic homology searching mechanism or that there exist additional or alternative mechanisms for locating homologues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8207053      PMCID: PMC2290927          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  39 in total

1.  Genetic control of chromosome synapsis in yeast meiosis.

Authors:  C N Giroux; M E Dresser; H F Tiano
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.166

Review 2.  The arrangement of interphase chromosomes: structural and functional aspects.

Authors:  A J Hilliker; R Appels
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes.

Authors:  N M Hollingsworth; L Goetsch; B Byers
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  L Cao; E Alani; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Multiple synaptonemal complexes (polycomplexes): origin, structure and function.

Authors:  P Goldstein
Journal:  Cell Biol Int Rep       Date:  1987-11

6.  A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains.

Authors:  E Alani; L Cao; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4.

Authors:  D Pinkel; J Landegent; C Collins; J Fuscoe; R Segraves; J Lucas; J Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination.

Authors:  E Alani; R Padmore; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-05-04       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Position effects in ectopic and allelic mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Lichten; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  HOP1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene.

Authors:  N M Hollingsworth; B Byers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  87 in total

1.  Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation.

Authors:  S M Burgess; N Kleckner; B M Weiner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Multiple roles of Spo11 in meiotic chromosome behavior.

Authors:  M Celerin; S T Merino; J E Stone; A M Menzie; M E Zolan
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Crossover interference in humans.

Authors:  E A Housworth; F W Stahl
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts.

Authors:  Tamara L Peoples; Eric Dean; Oscar Gonzalez; Lindsey Lambourne; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells.

Authors:  Alexander Lorenz; Jörg Fuchs; Reinhard Bürger; Josef Loidl
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2003-10

6.  A novel meiosis-specific protein of fission yeast, Meu13p, promotes homologous pairing independently of homologous recombination.

Authors:  K Nabeshima; Y Kakihara; Y Hiraoka; H Nojima
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation.

Authors:  Denise Zickler
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Telomere-mediated chromosome pairing during meiosis in budding yeast.

Authors:  B Rockmill; G S Roeder
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 9.  Sex and the single cell: meiosis in yeast.

Authors:  G S Roeder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Caenorhabditis elegans Ce-rdh-1/rad-51 functions after double-strand break formation of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Takako Takanami; Akiyuki Mori; Hideyuki Takahashi; Saburo Horiuchi; Atsushi Higashitani
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.