Literature DB >> 12101126

Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts.

Tamara L Peoples1, Eric Dean, Oscar Gonzalez, Lindsey Lambourne, Sean M Burgess.   

Abstract

A site-specific recombination system that probes the relative probabilities that pairs of chromosomal loci collide with one another in living cells of budding yeast was used to explore the relative contributions of pairing, recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and telomere clustering to the close juxtaposition of homologous chromosome pairs during meiosis. The level of Cre-mediated recombination between a pair of loxP sites located at an allelic position on homologous chromosomes was 13-fold greater than that between a pair of loxP sites located at ectopic positions on nonhomologous chromosomes. Mutations affecting meiotic recombination initiation and the processing of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) into single-end invasions (SEIs) reduced the levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination levels by three- to sixfold. The severity of Cre/loxP phenotypes is presented in contrast to relatively weak DSB-independent pairing defects as assayed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for these mutants. Mutations affecting synaptonemal complex (SC) formation or crossover control gave wild-type levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination. A delay in attaining maximum levels of allelic Cre-mediated recombination was observed for a mutant defective in telomere clustering. None of the mutants affected ectopic levels of recombination. These data suggest that stable, close homolog juxtaposition in yeast is distinct from pre-DSB pairing interactions, requires both DSB and SEI formation, but does not depend on crossovers or SC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12101126      PMCID: PMC186361          DOI: 10.1101/gad.983802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  63 in total

Review 1.  Hanging on to your homolog: the roles of pairing, synapsis and recombination in the maintenance of homolog adhesion.

Authors:  M Y Walker; R S Hawley
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis.

Authors:  T Allers; M Lichten
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  N Hunter; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J L Gerton; J DeRisi; R Shroff; M Lichten; P O Brown; T D Petes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evidence for two types of allelic recombination in yeast.

Authors:  F SHERMAN; H ROMAN
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Functional dissection of in vivo interchromosome association in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L Aragón-Alcaide; A V Strunnikov
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference.

Authors:  P R Chua; G S Roeder
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Restriction of ectopic recombination by interhomolog interactions during Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis.

Authors:  A S Goldman; M Lichten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Progression of meiotic DNA replication is modulated by interchromosomal interaction proteins, negatively by Spo11p and positively by Rec8p.

Authors:  R S Cha; B M Weiner; S Keeney; J Dekker; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Meiotic telomere protein Ndj1p is required for meiosis-specific telomere distribution, bouquet formation and efficient homologue pairing.

Authors:  E Trelles-Sticken; M E Dresser; H Scherthan
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  38 in total

1.  Localization and roles of Ski8p protein in Sordaria meiosis and delineation of three mechanistically distinct steps of meiotic homolog juxtaposition.

Authors:  Sophie Tessé; Aurora Storlazzi; Nancy Kleckner; Silvana Gargano; Denise Zickler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Altered nuclear distribution of recombination protein RAD51 in maize mutants suggests the involvement of RAD51 in meiotic homology recognition.

Authors:  Wojciech P Pawlowski; Inna N Golubovskaya; W Zacheus Cande
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells.

Authors:  Alexander Lorenz; Jörg Fuchs; Reinhard Bürger; Josef Loidl
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2003-10

4.  A molecular portrait of Arabidopsis meiosis.

Authors:  Hong Ma
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2006-06-06

Review 5.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Compartmentalization of the yeast meiotic nucleus revealed by analysis of ectopic recombination.

Authors:  Hélène B Schlecht; Michael Lichten; Alastair S H Goldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Multiple branches of the meiotic recombination pathway contribute independently to homolog pairing and stable juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast.

Authors:  Tamara L Peoples-Holst; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation.

Authors:  Denise Zickler
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  The multiple roles of cohesin in meiotic chromosome morphogenesis and pairing.

Authors:  Gloria A Brar; Andreas Hochwagen; Ly-sha S Ee; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Heterodimeric complexes of Hop2 and Mnd1 function with Dmc1 to promote meiotic homolog juxtaposition and strand assimilation.

Authors:  Yi-Kai Chen; Chih-Hsiang Leng; Heidi Olivares; Ming-Hui Lee; Yuan-Chih Chang; Wen-Mei Kung; Shih-Chieh Ti; Yu-Hui Lo; Andrew H-J Wang; Chia-Seng Chang; Douglas K Bishop; Yi-Ping Hsueh; Ting-Fang Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.