Literature DB >> 12112773

Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole-head magnetoencephalography.

Klaus Mathiak1, Alexander Rapp, Tilo T J Kircher, Wolfgang Grodd, Ingo Hertrich, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Werner Lutzenberger, Hermann Ackermann.   

Abstract

The central auditory system of the human brain uses a variety of mechanisms to analyze auditory scenes, among others, preattentive detection of sudden changes in the sound environment. Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) provide a measure to monitor neuronal cortical currents. The mismatch negativity (MMN) or field (MMNm) reflect preattentive activation in response to deviants within a sequence of homogenous auditory stimuli. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allows for a higher spatial resolution as compared to the extracranial electrophysiological techniques. The image encoding gradients of echo planar imaging (EPI) sequences, however, elicit an interfering background noise. To circumvent this shortcoming, the present study applied multi-echo EPI mimicking an auditory oddball design. The gradient trains (SOA = 800 msec, 94.5 dB SPL, stimulus duration = 152 msec) comprised amplitude (-9 dB) and duration (76 msec) deviants in a randomized sequence. Moreover, the scanner noise was recorded and applied in a whole-head MEG device to validate the properties of this specific material. Robust fMRI activation patterns emerged in response to the deviant gradient switching. Changes in amplitude activated the entire auditory cortex, whereas the duration deviants elicited right-lateralized signal increase in secondary areas. The recorded scanner noise evoked reliably right-lateralized mismatch MEG responses. Source localization was in accordance with activation of secondary auditory cortex. The presented paradigm provides a robust and feasible tool to study the functional anatomy of early cognitive auditory processing in clinical populations such as schizophrenia. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12112773      PMCID: PMC6872018          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  20 in total

1.  Functional MRI study of auditory and visual oddball tasks.

Authors:  T Yoshiura; J Zhong; D K Shibata; W E Kwok; D A Shrier; Y Numaguchi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Neural correlates of duplex perception: a whole-head magnetencephalography study.

Authors:  K Mathiak; I Hertrich; W Lutzenberger; H Ackermann
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-03-05       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; M A Akeroyd; A R Palmer; A Q Summerfield; M R Elliott; E M Gurney; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Human auditory middle latency responses: influence of stimulus type and intensity.

Authors:  C Borgmann; B Ross; R Draganova; C Pantev
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Brain lateralization for mismatch response to across- and within-category change of vowels.

Authors:  K Kasai; H Yamada; S Kamio; K Nakagome; A Iwanami; M Fukuda; K Itoh; I Koshida; M Yumoto; K Iramina; N Kato; S Ueno
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Encoding of temporal speech features (formant transients) during binaural and dichotic stimulus application: a whole-head magnetencephalography study.

Authors:  K Mathiak; I Hertrich; W Lutzenberger; H Ackermann
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

7.  Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise.

Authors:  T M Talavage; W B Edmister; P J Ledden; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings.

Authors:  C Pantev; O Bertrand; C Eulitz; C Verkindt; S Hampson; G Schuierer; T Elbert
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01

9.  Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation.

Authors:  D C Javitt; M Steinschneider; C E Schroeder; H G Vaughan; J C Arezzo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-12-26       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  R Näätänen; I Winkler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  27 in total

1.  Functional neuroimaging in mental disorders.

Authors:  Philip K McGuire; Kazunori Matsumoto
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 2.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Neurophysiological models for new treatment development in schizophrenia: early sensory approaches.

Authors:  Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG.

Authors:  Boris Kotchoubey; Jochen Kaiser; Vladimir Bostanov; Werner Lutzenberger; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  BOLD responses in human auditory cortex are more closely related to transient MEG responses than to sustained ones.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Matti S Hämäläinen; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Temporal pattern of acoustic imaging noise asymmetrically modulates activation in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ruwan D Ranaweera; Minseok Kwon; Shuowen Hu; Gregory G Tamer; Wen-Ming Luh; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory mismatch impairments are characterized by core neural dysfunctions in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Arnim Johannes Gaebler; Klaus Mathiak; Jan Willem Koten; Andrea Anna König; Yury Koush; David Weyer; Conny Depner; Simeon Matentzoglu; James Christopher Edgar; Klaus Willmes; Mikhail Zvyagintsev
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  A real-time data acquisition and control of gradient coil noise for fMRI identification of hearing disorder in children with history of ear infection.

Authors:  Jaeseung Lee; James Holte; E Russell Ritenour
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.