Literature DB >> 9921661

Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.

C M McKay1, R P Carlyon.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the perception of unmodulated and amplitude-modulated pulse trains by normally hearing listeners and cochlear implantees. Four normally hearing subjects listened to acoustic pulse trains, which were band-pass filtered between 3.9 and 5.3 kHz. Four cochlear implantees, all postlinguistically deaf users of the Mini System 22 implant, listened to current pulse trains produced at a single electrode position. In the first experiment, a set of nine loudness-balanced unmodulated stimuli with rates between 60 and 300 Hz were presented in a multidimensional scaling task. The resultant stimulus spaces for both subject groups showed a single dimension associated with the rate of the stimuli. In the second experiment, a set of ten loudness-balanced modulated stimuli was constructed, with carrier rates between 140 and 300 Hz, and modulation rates between 60 and 150 Hz. The modulation rates were integer submultiples of the carrier rates, and each modulation period consisted of one higher-intensity pulse and one or more identical lower-intensity pulses. The modulation depth of each stimulus was adjusted so that its pitch was judged to be higher or lower 50% of the time than that of an unmodulated pulse train having a rate equal to the geometric mean of the carrier and modulation rates. A multidimensional scaling task with these ten stimuli resulted in two-dimensional stimulus spaces, with dimensions corresponding to carrier and modulation rates. A further investigation with one normally hearing subject showed that the perceptual weighting of the two dimensions varied systematically with modulation depth. It was concluded that, when filtered appropriately, acoustic pulse trains can be used to produce percepts in normal listeners that share common features with those experienced by subjects listening through one channel of a cochlear implant, and that the central auditory system can extract two temporal patterns arising from the same cochlear location.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921661     DOI: 10.1121/1.424553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Encoding pitch contours using current steering.

Authors:  Xin Luo; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Anastasios Sarampalis; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Sara I Duran; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Multidimensional scaling between acoustic and electric stimuli in cochlear implant users with contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Katrien Vermeire; David M Landsberger; Peter Schleich; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effects of center frequency and rate on the sensitivity to interaural delay in high-frequency click trains.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.