Literature DB >> 15675001

Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.

Monita Chatterjee1, Sandra I Oba.   

Abstract

The effects of modulated maskers on detection thresholds of a 50-Hz sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) in a signal carrier were measured in nine cochlear implant (CI) listeners as a function of masker envelope type and for different masker-signal electrode separations. Both signal and masker were 200-ms-long pulse trains, presented concurrently in an interleaved stimulation mode. Masker envelopes were SAM at 20, 50, (0- and pi-phase re: the signal modulator), and 125 Hz, as well as noise amplitude modulated (NAM), all with a fixed 20% modulation depth. Comparisons were made against steady-state maskers that had an amplitude equal to the mean amplitude of the modulated maskers or to their peak amplitude (SS(peak)). Modulation thresholds were larger in the presence of the dynamic maskers versus the SS(peak) maskers; however, there was significant intersubject variability in the pattern of results. Effects of relative phase between masker and signal were not consistent across subjects. Envelope masking (the dB difference in modulation detection thresholds between modulated and SS(peak) maskers) was generally larger for the lower-modulation-frequency maskers than the 125-Hz masker. The spatial distribution of masked modulation detection thresholds was found to be considerably different from spatial forward-masking patterns obtained in the same subjects. Finally, modulation thresholds measured for a very wide separation between the masker and signal showed significant envelope masking. These results suggest that, as has been shown in acoustic stimulation, central, across-channel temporal processing mechanisms also occur in electrical stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15675001      PMCID: PMC2504569          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4050-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  28 in total

1.  Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference?

Authors:  B J Kwon; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Jesko L Verhey; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft; J Opie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant.

Authors:  R V Shannon; D D Adams; R L Ferrel; R L Palumbo; M Grandgenett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

2.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Kaibao Nie; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Cherish Oberzut
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Yang-Wenyi Liu; Duo-Duo Tao; Bing Chen; Xiaoting Cheng; Yilai Shu; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.