Literature DB >> 20649189

Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes.

Carolina Abdala1, Sumitrajit Dhar.   

Abstract

DPOAE (2f(1)-f(2)) phase was measured across a 3-octave frequency range from two groups of newborns using ER10B+ and ER10C probe microphones. A marked phase shift was noted in the mid-to-high frequency range for newborn data recorded with the ER10C only. In contrast, the ER10B+ produced phase that was approximately invariant as a function of frequency for most of the range. Probe-related phase shifts can be effectively eliminated by correcting for variations in the phases of the primary tones. Results highlight the importance of detecting and correcting for system-related phase shifts so they are not misinterpreted as cochlear in origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649189      PMCID: PMC2905449          DOI: 10.1121/1.3453415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking.

Authors:  C A Shera; C L Talmadge; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On the relationships between the fixed-f1, fixed-f2, and fixed-ratio phase derivatives of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  A Tubis; C L Talmadge; C Tong; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Carrick L Talmadge; Glenis R Long; Arnold Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear.

Authors:  R D Knight; D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A comparative study of distortion-product-otoacoustic-emission fine structure in human newborns and adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.

Authors:  Glenis R Long; Carrick L Talmadge; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission phase and component analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; A Tubis; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Breaking away: violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Abigail Rogers; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The breaking of cochlear scaling symmetry in human newborns and adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Srikanta Mishra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency shifts in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.