Literature DB >> 9917669

Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty.

G P Duffy1, D J Berry, J A Rand.   

Abstract

A prospectively studied group of 55 uncemented Press Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasties was compared retrospectively with a matched group of 51 cemented Press Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasties at a mean of 10 years after operation. For the cemented group, the pain and function scores improved from 32 and 45 preoperatively to 95 and 77, respectively. For the uncemented group the scores improved from 33 and 50 preoperatively to 93 and 60, respectively. There were 10 revisions in the uncemented group for femoral or tibial aseptic loosening or osteolysis compared with two revisions in the cemented group. Exclusive of problems related to patellar metal backing, survival to revision for aseptic failure or radiographic loosening was 72% in the uncemented group and 94% in the cemented group at 10 years. A significantly higher revision rate was found in the uncemented compared with cemented total knee arthroplasty of the Press Fit Condylar design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917669     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Cemented versus uncemented femoral components in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig; Tarik Aït Si Selmi; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: 13-year survivorship of AGC total knee systems with average 7 years followup.

Authors:  Philip M Faris; E Michael Keating; Alex Farris; John B Meding; Merrill A Ritter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Total knee arthroplasty using cementless keels and cemented tibial trays: 10-year results.

Authors:  Frank R Kolisek; Michael A Mont; Thorsten M Seyler; David R Marker; Nenette M Jessup; Junaed A Siddiqui; Eric Monesmith; Slif D Ulrich
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers.

Authors:  Hongchuan Wang; Hua Lou; Huiwei Zhang; Junwei Jiang; Kai Liu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Long lasting outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in primary knee arthroplasty: a continuous series of two hundred and seventy total knee arthroplasties at fifteen to twenty two years of clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Jean-Alain Epinette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Salvatore Risitano; Luigi Sabatini; Matteo Giachino; Gabriele Agati; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

7.  Higher body mass index is not associated with worse pain outcomes after primary or revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Sherine E Gabriel; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Hyung-Mook Lim; Eun-Soo Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Are younger patients undergoing TKAs appropriately characterized as active?

Authors:  James A Keeney; Ryan M Nunley; Rick W Wright; Robert L Barrack; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Simone Cerciello; Michele Vasso; Mario Tartarone
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.