Literature DB >> 21161174

Cemented versus uncemented femoral components in total knee arthroplasty.

Guillaume Demey1, Elvire Servien, Sebastien Lustig, Tarik Aït Si Selmi, Philippe Neyret.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to analyse the influence of femoral cement on clinical and radiological results after total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: Preoperatively 130 patients were randomly assigned to treatment in either the Cement Group or the Hybrid Group. The International Knee Society scores, femoral radiolucent lines and bone transparencies were compared.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences concerning postoperative knee and function scores. We observed a significant difference in radiolucent lines (Cement Group, 24%; Hybrid Group, 2%; P < 0.001) as well as bone transparencies (Cement Group, 21%; Hybrid Group, 62%; P < 0.001). All radiolucent lines measured less than 2 mm in width.
CONCLUSION: Cementing the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty does not appear to influence the clinical results. A longer follow-up period is required to determine the influence of radiological findings on final outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21161174     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1347-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

1.  Low contact stress mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: results at 5 to 13 years.

Authors:  J M Hartford; T Hunt; H Kaufer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years.

Authors:  Ake Carlsson; Anders Björkman; Jack Besjakov; Ingemar Onsten
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Zone 4 femoral radiolucent lines in hybrid versus cemented total knee arthroplasties: are they clinically significant?

Authors:  James I Huddleston; Jeffrey W Wiley; Richard D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D E Font-Rodriguez; G R Scuderi; J N Insall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

6.  Long-term followup of the Miller-Galante total knee replacement.

Authors:  R A Berger; A G Rosenberg; R M Barden; M B Sheinkop; J J Jacobs; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Survival analysis of a cementless, cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic assessment 10 to 13 years after surgery.

Authors:  H Watanabe; S Akizuki; T Takizawa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

8.  ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems.

Authors:  B Van Rietbergen; R Huiskes; H Weinans; D R Sumner; T M Turner; J O Galante
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G P Duffy; D J Berry; J A Rand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral component failure in hybrid total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M D Campbell; G P Duffy; R T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no difference between cemented and hybrid implantation.

Authors:  Michael Iosifidis; Efthymios Iliopoulos; Dimos Neofytou; Nikolaos Sakorafas; Dimitrios Andreou; Dimitrios Alvanos; Anastasios Kyriakidis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Radek Wojtowicz; Kjell G Nilsson; Sead Crnalic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effect of fixation type on the survivorship of contemporary total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years of age: a register-based study of 115,177 knees in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 2000-2016.

Authors:  Mika J Niemeläinen; Keijo T Mäkelä; Otto Robertsson; Annette W-Dahl; Ove Furnes; Anne M Fenstad; Alma B Pedersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Aleksi Reito; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carl L Herndon; Kyle L McCormick; Anastasia Gazgalis; Elise C Bixby; Matthew M Levitsky; Alexander L Neuwirth
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-11

5.  Hybrid total knee arthroplasty revisited: midterm followup of hybrid versus cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher E Pelt; Jeremy M Gililland; Justin Doble; Benjamin M Stronach; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.