Literature DB >> 24382665

Long lasting outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in primary knee arthroplasty: a continuous series of two hundred and seventy total knee arthroplasties at fifteen to twenty two years of clinical follow-up.

Jean-Alain Epinette1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study is a long-term review of an hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated knee prosthesis. Our aim was to confirm that excellent previously reported results with HA knees could stand the test of time at the 15-year milestone.
METHODS: A total of 270 cruciate retaining HA-Omnifit knees, implanted in the same institution by a single surgeon with the same surgical procedure, were reviewed at 15-22 years of clinical follow-up (75 knees partially-coated and 195 fully-coated).
RESULTS: At review, IKS mean values were 95.6 points for knee score and 91.19 points for function score. Radiological review confirmed an excellent long-lasting fixation over years in the long run. Taking implant failure as the end-point, the survival rate was 97.1% at 20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results were as good, and often better, than the best cemented or porous published studies. These very encouraging results at 15-22 years make us very confident in the ultimate outcome of bioconductive coatings in knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24382665      PMCID: PMC3923926          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2246-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  Tibial component fixation in porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated total knee arthroplasty: a radiostereo metric evaluation of migration and inducible displacement after 5 years.

Authors:  L Regnér; L Carlsson; J Kärrholm; P Herberts
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: clinical experience at 10 to 15 years.

Authors:  J-A Epinette; M T Manley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-01

3.  Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years.

Authors:  A W McCaskie; D J Deehan; T P Green; K R Lock; J R Thompson; W M Harper; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

4.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Long-term outcome in an uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: a 15- to 18-year survivorship analysis.

Authors:  J T K Melton; R Mayahi; S E Baxter; M Facek; C Glezos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-08

6.  A hydroxyapatite-coated Insall-Burstein II total knee replacement: 11-year results.

Authors:  M C Oliver; O D Keast-Butler; B L Hinves; J A N Shepperd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-04

7.  Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry.

Authors:  K G Nilsson; J Kärrholm; L Carlsson; T Dalén
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Trabecular metal tibia still stable at 5 years: an RSA study of 36 patients aged less than 60 years.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Dan Rösmark; Kjell G Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating appears to be of benefit for implant durability of tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Voigt; Michael Mosier
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The beneficial effect of hydroxyapatite lasts: a randomized radiostereometric trial comparing hydroxyapatite-coated, uncoated, and cemented tibial components for up to 16 years.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Edward R Valstar; Bart L Kaptein; Marta Fiocco; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Biological strategies for improved osseointegration and osteoinduction of porous metal orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Eric Alexander Lewallen; Scott M Riester; Carolina A Bonin; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Amel Dudakovic; Sanjeev Kakar; Robert C Cohen; Jennifer J Westendorf; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Total knee replacement with tibial tubercle osteotomy in rheumatoid patients with stiff knee.

Authors:  Ahmed Salem Eid; Wael Ahmed Mohamed Nassar; Tamer Abdelmeguid Mohamed Fayyad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Radek Wojtowicz; Kjell G Nilsson; Sead Crnalic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jonathan T Evans; Robert W Walker; Jonathan P Evans; Ashley W Blom; Adrian Sayers; Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Bisphosphonate-adsorbed ceramic nanoparticles increase bone formation in an injectable carrier for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Tegan L Cheng; Ciara M Murphy; Roya Ravarian; Fariba Dehghani; David G Little; Aaron Schindeler
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 7.813

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.