Literature DB >> 22618211

Facilitated early ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery: a case-matched study.

S Memon1, A G Heriot, C E Atkin, A C Lynch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of an early stoma closure protocol facilitated by Seprafilm wrapping of defunctioning ileostomies compared with a similar group of patients with conventional stoma formation and closure.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing defunctioning ileostomy following rectal resection with pelvic anastomosis were planned for early closure and had their ileostomy wrapped in Seprafilm at the time of formation. Stoma closure was performed at 4-6 weeks if water-soluble contrast enema showed no evidence of leak, and the patient's physiological parameters had been optimized. Patients were matched for age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, neoadjuvant treatment and procedure, with patients undergoing conventional ileostomy formation and closure. Outcomes were compared using the 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Following resection, twenty-two patients (69 %) were suitable for early closure and underwent stoma closure at a median of 37 days (range 25-90 days). Seprafilm-wrapped ileostomies were closed earlier than the conventional ileostomies (median 55 days (range 25-250 days) versus 213 days (range 86-352 days), p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups as regards length of hospital stay or complications following ileostomy closure. Eighteen Seprafilm stoma patients and 22 conventional stoma patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median time to starting chemotherapy from resection was 10 versus 8.5 weeks, respectively (p = 0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: An early stoma closure protocol facilitated by Seprafilm wrapping of the ileostomy is practical, does not increase morbidity and significantly reduces the time with a stoma for the patient. An early stoma closure protocol did not significantly delay in the commencement of chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22618211     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0843-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  35 in total

1.  A comparison of one layer and two layer techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  W G Everett
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Outcome of temporary stomas. A prospective study of temporary intestinal stomas constructed between 1989 and 1996.

Authors:  M Kairaluoma; H Rissanen; V Kultti; J-P Mecklin; I Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 3.  Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Orit Kaidar-Person; Benjamin Person; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Loop ileostomy after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis--is it necessary?

Authors:  M C Winslet; G Barsoum; W Pringle; K Fox; M R Keighley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy.

Authors:  A W Gooszen; R H Geelkerken; J Hermans; M B Lagaay; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Bioresorbable hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose membrane (Seprafilm) in surgery for rectal carcinoma: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Masato Kusunoki; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Hidenori Yanagi; Masafumi Noda; Hitoshi Tonouchi; Yasuhiko Mohri; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiro Inoue; Minako Kobayashi; Chikao Miki; Takehira Yamamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Does delaying adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery for colorectal cancer impair survival? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaetan Des Guetz; Patrick Nicolas; Gérard-Yves Perret; Jean-François Morere; Bernard Uzzan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy.

Authors:  G F Giannakopoulos; A A F A Veenhof; D L van der Peet; C Sietses; W J H J Meijerink; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Bioresorbable adhesion barrier facilitates early closure of the defunctioning ileostomy after rectal excision: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Choong-Leong Tang; Francis Seow-Choen; Stephanie Fook-Chong; Kong-Weng Eu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Is routine pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in colonic J-pouch really necessary?

Authors:  G M da Silva; S D Wexner; B Gurland; P Gervaz; Seong Do Moon; J Efron; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; A M Vernava; O Zmora
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  3 in total

1.  Use of Sodium Hyaluronate/Carboxymethylcellulose Bioresorbable Membrane in Loop Ileostomy Construction Facilitates Stoma Closure.

Authors:  Danielle M Bertoni; Kerry L Hammond; David E Beck; Terry C Hicks; Charles B Whitlow; H David Vargas; David A Margolin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

2.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Early Closure of Defunctioning Loop Ileostomy: Is It Beneficial for the Patient? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Menahem; Jean Lubrano; Antoine Vallois; Arnaud Alves
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.