Literature DB >> 2745238

A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment.

S A Mason1, G G McGee, V Farmer-Dougan, T R Risley.   

Abstract

There is a need for practical methods of reinforcer assessment that systematically track ongoing changes in clients' preferences. In this study, the effects of a time-efficient reinforcer assessment package were evaluated in a multiple baseline across 3 preschoolers with autism, comparing individualized item selections by experienced teachers with children's presession preferences for items of various sensory qualities. Systematic assessment of children's reinforcers for correct responding virtually eliminated nontargeted maladaptive behaviors, as well as yielding expected improvements in accuracy. The powerful side-effects of potent reinforcers underline the importance of increased attention to reinforcer assessment in research and practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2745238      PMCID: PMC1286167          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  17 in total

1.  Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  D M Baer; M M Wolf; T R Risley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

2.  Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children.

Authors:  A Rincover; C D Newsom; O I Lovaas; R L Koegel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1977-10

3.  Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid; L K White; R C Halford; D P Brittain; S M Gardner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1988

4.  Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.

Authors:  J Dattilo
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1986

5.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

6.  Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students.

Authors:  D P Wacker; W K Berg; B Wiggins; M Muldoon; J Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

7.  National Society for Autistic Children definition of the syndrome of autism.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Autism Child Schizophr       Date:  1978-06

8.  The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children.

Authors:  M Ferrari; S L Harris
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981

9.  Experimental analysis of response covariation among compliant and inappropriate behaviors.

Authors:  J M Parrish; M F Cataldo; D J Kolko; N A Neef; A L Egel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1986

10.  Response-reinforcer relationships and improved learning in autistic children.

Authors:  J A Williams; R L Koegel; A L Egel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981
View more
  25 in total

1.  A comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice.

Authors:  R B Graff; M E Libby
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; W W Fisher; V Rodriguez-Catter; K Maglieri; K Herman; J M Marhefka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: a research synthesis.

Authors:  Robert H Horner; Edward G Carr; Phillip S Strain; Anne W Todd; Holly K Reed
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2002-10

4.  Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Jana S Lindberg; Juliet Conners
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

5.  Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Meagan K Gregory; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Melissa J Allman; Arthur E Wilke; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

6.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

7.  Some determinants of changes in preference over time.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

8.  Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  D C Lerman; B A Iwata; B Rainville; J D Adelinis; K Crosland; J Kogan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

9.  On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.

Authors:  W W Fisher; R H Thompson; C C Piazza; K Crosland; D Gotjen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

10.  Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.

Authors:  L G Bowman; C C Piazza; W W Fisher; L P Hagopian; J S Kogan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.