Literature DB >> 9832540

Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: morphology and flowering time.

R G Shaw1, D L Byers, F H Shaw.   

Abstract

The standard approaches to estimation of quantitative genetic parameters and prediction of response to selection on quantitative traits are based on theory derived for populations undergoing random mating. Many studies demonstrate, however, that mating systems in natural populations often involve inbreeding in various degrees (i.e. , self matings and matings between relatives). Here we apply theory developed for estimating quantitative genetic parameters for partially inbreeding populations to a population of Nemophila menziesii recently obtained from nature and experimentally inbred. Two measures of overall plant size and two of floral size expressed highly significant inbreeding depression. Of three dominance components of phenotypic variance that are defined under partial inbreeding, one was found to contribute significantly to phenotypic variance in flower size and flowering time, while the remaining two components contributed only negligibly to variation in each of the five traits considered. Computer simulations investigating selection response under the more complete genetic model for populations undergoing mixed mating indicate that, for parameter values estimated in this study, selection response can be substantially slowed relative to predictions for a random mating population. Moreover, inbreeding depression alone does not generally account for the reduction in selection response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9832540      PMCID: PMC1460430     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  11 in total

1.  The components of genetic variance in populations of biparental progenies and their use in estimating the average degree of dominance.

Authors:  R E COMSTOCK; H F ROBINSON
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1948-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations.

Authors:  J D Ballou
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Selection response in finite populations.

Authors:  M Wei; A Caballero; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations.

Authors:  N R Wray; R Thompson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Higher order probability functions of identity of allelles by descent.

Authors:  C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Selection with partial selfing. I. Mass selection.

Authors:  A J Wright; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Individual variation in inbreeding depression: the roles of inbreeding history and mutation.

Authors:  S T Schultz; J H Willis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J C Mulley; D Reid; L Pascoe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Quantitative genetics of response to competitors in Nemophila menziesii: a field experiment.

Authors:  R G Shaw; G A Platenkamp; F H Shaw; R H Podolsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating.

Authors:  C C Cockerham; B S Weir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  10 in total

1.  Estimation of variance components of quantitative traits in inbred populations.

Authors:  M Abney; M S McPeek; C Ober
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Effects of mating system on adaptive potential for leaf morphology in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Stefan Andersson; Jones K Ofori
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  J Costa E Silva; C Hardner; P Tilyard; B M Potts
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Genetic variance components and heritability of multiallelic heterozygosity under inbreeding.

Authors:  P Nietlisbach; L F Keller; E Postma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  The heritability of gestational age in a two-million member cohort: implications for spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Wilfred Wu; David J Witherspoon; Alison Fraser; Erin A S Clark; Alan Rogers; Gregory J Stoddard; Tracy A Manuck; Karin Chen; M Sean Esplin; Ken R Smith; Michael W Varner; Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Pedigree-free estimates of heritability in the wild: promising prospects for selfing populations.

Authors:  Laurene Gay; Mathieu Siol; Joelle Ronfort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Shift in ecological strategy helps marginal populations of shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) to overcome a high genetic load.

Authors:  Marion Orsucci; Pascal Milesi; Johanna Hansen; Johanna Girodolle; Sylvain Glémin; Martin Lascoux
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Domestication reshaped the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in a maize landrace compared to its wild relative, teosinte.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Samayoa; Bode A Olukolu; Chin Jian Yang; Qiuyue Chen; Markus G Stetter; Alessandra M York; Jose de Jesus Sanchez-Gonzalez; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Peter J Bradbury; Maria Cinta Romay; Qi Sun; Jinliang Yang; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Edward S Buckler; John F Doebley; James B Holland
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.