Literature DB >> 15911591

A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression.

Jacob A Moorad1, Michael J Wade.   

Abstract

Inbreeding depression is expected to play an important but complicated role in evolution. If we are to understand the evolution of inbreeding depression (i.e., purging), we need quantitative genetic interpretations of its variation. We introduce an experimental design in which sires are mated to multiple dams, some of which are unrelated to the sire but others are genetically related owing to an arbitrary number of prior generations of selfing or sib-mating. In this way we introduce the concept of "inbreeding depression effect variance," a parameter more relevant to selection and the purging of inbreeding depression than previous measures. We develop an approach for interpreting the genetic basis of the variation in inbreeding depression by: (1) predicting the variation in inbreeding depression given arbitrary initial genetic variance and (2) estimating genetic variance components given half-sib covariances estimated by our experimental design. As quantitative predictions of selection depend upon understanding genetic variation, our approach reveals the important difference between how inbreeding depression is measured experimentally and how it is viewed by selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911591      PMCID: PMC1451195          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.033373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  23 in total

1.  An association between a floral trait and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  N Takebayashi; L F Delph
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Inbreeding and the genetic variance in floral traits of Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  J K Kelly; H S Arathi
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  GENOTYPIC COVARIANCES BETWEEN INBRED RELATIVES.

Authors:  D L HARRIS
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Family level inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Covariances of relatives and selection response in generations of selfing from an outcrossed base population.

Authors:  A J Wright; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF MATING SYSTEM, SEED WEIGHT, AND EMERGENCE DATE IN A WINTER ANNUAL, COLLINSIA VERNA.

Authors:  Susan Kalisz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  THE EVOLUTION OF SELF-FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The variance in inbreeding depression and the recovery of fitness in bottlenecked populations.

Authors:  K Fowler; M C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  EPISTASIS AND THE EFFECT OF FOUNDER EVENTS ON THE ADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE.

Authors:  Charles J Goodnight
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  7 in total

1.  Age specificity of inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster and implications for the evolution of late-life mortality plateaus.

Authors:  Rose M Reynolds; Sara Temiyasathit; Melissa M Reedy; Elizabeth A Ruedi; Jenny M Drnevich; Jeff Leips; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  J Costa E Silva; C Hardner; P Tilyard; B M Potts
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Parental care buffers against inbreeding depression in burying beetles.

Authors:  Natalie Pilakouta; Seonaidh Jamieson; Jacob A Moorad; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Maternal effects alter the severity of inbreeding depression in the offspring.

Authors:  Natalie Pilakouta; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A multivariate analysis with direct additive and inbreeding depression load effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Juan Altarriba; Carlos Moreno; María Martínez-Castillero; Joaquim Casellas
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Domestication reshaped the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in a maize landrace compared to its wild relative, teosinte.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Samayoa; Bode A Olukolu; Chin Jian Yang; Qiuyue Chen; Markus G Stetter; Alessandra M York; Jose de Jesus Sanchez-Gonzalez; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Peter J Bradbury; Maria Cinta Romay; Qi Sun; Jinliang Yang; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Edward S Buckler; John F Doebley; James B Holland
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Evaluation of intron-1 of odorant-binding protein-1 of Anopheles stephensi as a marker for the identification of biological forms or putative sibling species.

Authors:  Om P Singh; Shobhna Mishra; Gunjan Sharma; Ankita Sindhania; Taranjeet Kaur; U Sreehari; Manoj K Das; Neera Kapoor; Bhavna Gupta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.