Literature DB >> 12871916

Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus.

John K Kelly1.   

Abstract

Deleterious mutations are relevant to a broad range of questions in genetics and evolutionary biology. I present an application of the "biometric method" for estimating mutational parameters for male fitness characters of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. The biometric method rests on two critical assumptions. The first is that experimental inbreeding changes genotype frequencies without changing allele frequencies; i.e., there is no genetic purging during the experiment. I satisfy this condition by employing a breeding design in which the parents are randomly extracted, fully homozygous inbred lines. The second is that all genetic variation is attributable to deleterious mutations maintained in mutation-selection balance. I explicitly test this hypothesis using likelihood ratios. Of the three deleterious mutation models tested, the first two are rejected for all characters. The failure of these models is due to an excess of additive genetic variation relative to the expectation under mutation-selection balance. The third model is not rejected for either of two log-transformed male fitness traits. However, this model imposes only "weak conditions" and is not sufficiently detailed to provide estimates for mutational parameters. The implication is that, if biometric methods are going to yield useful parameter estimates, they will need to consider mutational models more complicated than those typically employed in experimental studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12871916      PMCID: PMC1462635     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  37 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rapid loss of stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster under adaptation to laboratory culture.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; R Hallas; C Sinclair; L Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  An experimental method for evaluating the contribution of deleterious mutations to quantitative trait variation.

Authors:  J K Kelly
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Deleterious mutations and genetic variation for flower size in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  J K Kelly; J H Willis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Our load of mutations.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: morphology and flowering time.

Authors:  R G Shaw; D L Byers; F H Shaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xvi. Excess of Additive Genetic Variance of Viability.

Authors:  T Mukai; S Nagano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A molecular approach to estimating the human deleterious mutation rate.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; J F Crow
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  18 in total

1.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence for diploid selection models with arbitrary dominance.

Authors:  Scott Williamson; Adi Fledel-Alon; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Viability selection prior to trait expression is an essential component of natural selection.

Authors:  Julius P Mojica; John K Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Mutation and the evolution of ageing: from biometrics to system genetics.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Centromere-associated meiotic drive and female fitness variation in Mimulus.

Authors:  Lila Fishman; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Epistasis in monkeyflowers.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Testing the rare-alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Age specificity of inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster and implications for the evolution of late-life mortality plateaus.

Authors:  Rose M Reynolds; Sara Temiyasathit; Melissa M Reedy; Elizabeth A Ruedi; Jenny M Drnevich; Jeff Leips; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  Sarah A Bodbyl Roels; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.