Literature DB >> 9183845

Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations.

J D Ballou1.   

Abstract

Inbreeding depression can be reduced, or purged, by selection against deleterious alleles. This prediction is the basis of the recommendation that captive wildlife populations suffering from inbreeding depression be intentionally bred from healthy inbred animals. Yet data on the effectiveness of purging inbreeding depression are few. In this study I present and use two different regression models (an ancestral inbreeding model and a lethal recessive model) to test for the presence of purging effects in 25 captive mammalian populations. Fitness components examined were neonatal survival, survival from neonate to weaning, and litter size. In only one species was purging statistically significant. However, 15 of 17 species that showed inbreeding depression exhibited a slight decline in inbreeding depression in neonatal survival among descendants of inbred animals. These results show a small but highly significant trend of purging on neonatal survival. No trends in purging effects were observed in weaning survival or litter size. The effects were not likely to be strong enough to be of practical use in eliminating inbreeding depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9183845     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  31 in total

1.  Surviving with low genetic diversity: the case of albatrosses.

Authors:  Emmanuel Milot; Henri Weimerskirch; Pierre Duchesne; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: morphology and flowering time.

Authors:  R G Shaw; D L Byers; F H Shaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The relation between reproductive value and genetic contribution.

Authors:  Nicholas H Barton; Alison M Etheridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Slow inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster express as much inbreeding depression as fast inbred lines under semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Morten Ravn Knudsen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.

Authors:  M Á R de Cara; B Villanueva; M Á Toro; J Fernández
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  The variance in inbreeding depression and the recovery of fitness in bottlenecked populations.

Authors:  K Fowler; M C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Detection of genetic purging and predictive value of purging parameters estimated in pedigreed populations.

Authors:  Eugenio López-Cortegano; Diego Bersabé; Jinliang Wang; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Evaluating the genetic status of a closed colony of titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus) using multigenerational pedigrees.

Authors:  Sree Kanthaswamy; Karen L Bales
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 0.667

9.  Royal dynasties as human inbreeding laboratories: the Habsburgs.

Authors:  F C Ceballos; G Alvarez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Trends in genetic diversity and the effect of inbreeding in American Angus cattle under genomic selection.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Lozada-Soto; Christian Maltecca; Duc Lu; Stephen Miller; John B Cole; Francesco Tiezzi
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.