Literature DB >> 9827866

Hitting moving targets. Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target's velocity.

E Brenner1, J B Smeets, M H de Lussanet.   

Abstract

Previous studies on how we hit moving targets have revealed that the direction in which we move our hand is continuously adjusted on the basis of the target's perceived position, with a delay of about 110 ms. In the present study we show that the acceleration of the hand is also under such continuous control. Subjects were instructed to hit moving targets (running spiders) as quickly as possible with a rod. We found that changing the velocity of the target influenced the speed with which the rod was moved. The influence was noticeable about 200 ms after the target's velocity changed. The extent of the influence was consistent with a direct dependence of the acceleration of the hand on the target's velocity. We conclude that the acceleration of the hand is continuously adjusted on the basis of the speed of the target, with a delay of about 200 ms.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9827866     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Tom Middelburg; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The quantitative use of velocity information in fast interception.

Authors:  Marc H E de Lussanet; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Systematic changes in the duration and precision of interception in response to variation of amplitude and effector size.

Authors:  James R Tresilian; Annaliese Plooy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Two eyes in action.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manually controlled human balancing using visual, vestibular and proprioceptive senses involves a common, low frequency neural process.

Authors:  Martin Lakie; Ian D Loram
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Peter J Gawthrop; Martin Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Use of visual information in the correction of interceptive actions.

Authors:  Luis A Teixeira; Romeo Chua; Paul Nagelkerke; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Adaptations of lateral hand movements to early and late visual occlusion in catching.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The time course of amplitude specification in brief interceptive actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Annaliese Plooy; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.