Literature DB >> 18415092

The time course of amplitude specification in brief interceptive actions.

Welber Marinovic1, Annaliese Plooy, James R Tresilian.   

Abstract

The interception of fast moving objects typically allows the object to be seen for only a short period of time. This limits the time available to prepare the movement. To deal with short preparation intervals, performers are likely to prepare a motor program in advance. Although motor preparation may begin before the target is seen, accuracy requires that certain program parameters are determined from observations of the target. In the experiments reported here we sought to determine the last moment at which information about the distance to move (amplitude) can be incorporated into a program. We employed an empirical protocol that allowed us to examine whether new amplitude information is incorporated discretely or continuously into the program during short intervals prior to movement onset (MO)-the preparation interval. Participants were trained to hit targets at two different distances with movements of a specific duration (180 ms): targets were moving in "Experiment 1" and stationary in "Experiment 2". This method permitted an estimate of MO time. Preparation intervals were manipulated by delivering a stimulus cue for movement amplitude at varying times prior to the estimated MO. Results demonstrated that amplitude information could be effectively incorporated into the program provided the preparation interval was greater than about 200 ms. In addition, the results indicated that amplitude was specified predominantly in a discrete manner, though the number of responses directed towards a central default amplitude suggest that the distance between targets was near to a threshold for continuous specification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18415092     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1360-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Dynamics of visual feedback in a laboratory simulation of a penalty kick.

Authors:  Edgard Morya; Ronald Ranvaud; Walter Machado Pinheiro
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Time requirements of changes in program and parameter variables in rapid ongoing movements.

Authors:  J T Quinn; D E Sherwood
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series.

Authors:  N Teasdale; C Bard; M Fleury; D E Young; L Proteau
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Response amendment latencies during discrete arm movements.

Authors:  L G Carlton; M J Carlton
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Hitting a moving target: perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions.

Authors:  James R Tresilian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-01

7.  Hitting moving targets. Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target's velocity.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets; M H de Lussanet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Expertise, visual search, and information pick-up in squash.

Authors:  B Abernethy
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control.

Authors:  J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time.

Authors:  L Peper; R J Bootsma; D R Mestre; F C Bakker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Simranjit Sidhu; Stephan Riek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Extrapolation of vertical target motion through a brief visual occlusion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Marco Iosa; Vincenzo Maffei; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Preparation and inhibition of interceptive actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Annaliese M Plooy; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual attention affects temporal estimation in anticipatory motor actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Estimating the implicit component of visuomotor rotation learning by constraining movement preparation time.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Reece Gunn; Welber Marinovic; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Basal ganglia contributions to motor control: a vigorous tutor.

Authors:  Robert S Turner; Michel Desmurget
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cerebellar anodal tDCS increases implicit learning when strategic re-aiming is suppressed in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Stephan Riek; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.