Literature DB >> 16331508

Two eyes in action.

Eli Brenner1, Jeroen B J Smeets.   

Abstract

Do relative binocular disparities guide our movements in depth? In order to find out we asked subjects to move a 'cursor' to a target within a simulated horizontal plane at eye height. They did so by moving a computer mouse. We determined how quickly subjects responded to the target jumping in depth. We found that it took subjects about 200 ms to respond to changes in binocular disparity. Subjects responded just as quickly if the cursor was temporarily only visible to one eye near the time that the target jumped in depth, and less vigorously, though just as quickly, if the cursor jumped rather than the target, so the fastest binocular responses cannot be based directly on the relative retinal disparity between the target and the cursor. Subjects reacted faster to changes in the target's height in the visual field than to changes in binocular disparity, but did not react faster to changes in image size. These results suggest that binocular vision mainly improves people's everyday movements by giving them a better sense of the distances of relevant objects, rather than by relative retinal disparities being used to directly guide the movement. We propose that relative disparities only guide parts of very slow movements that require extreme precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16331508     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0213-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Comparing extra-retinal information about distance and direction.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perceived distance, shape and size.

Authors:  E Brenner; W J van Damme
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension.

Authors:  Paul B Hibbard; Mark F Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hitting moving targets. Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target's velocity.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets; M H de Lussanet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task.

Authors:  A Glennerster; B J Rogers; M F Bradshaw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension.

Authors:  P Servos; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements.

Authors:  Fabrice Sarlegna; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Christophe Bourdin; Gabriel M Gauthier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping.

Authors:  J J Marotta; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale; Nicole Mendarozqueta; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  7 in total

1.  A three dimensional view of stereopsis in dentistry.

Authors:  M A Mon-Williams; F Mushtaq; R M Wilkie; B Khambay; A Keeling; M Manogue
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Sources of variability in interceptive movements.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Binocular and monocular depth cues in online feedback control of 3D pointing movement.

Authors:  Bo Hu; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Monocular guidance of reaches-to-grasp using visible support surface texture: data and model.

Authors:  Rachel A Herth; Xiaoye Michael Wang; Olivia Cherry; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of sensory uncertainty due to amblyopia (lazy eye) on the planning and execution of visually-guided 3D reaching movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dressmakers show enhanced stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Dennis M Levi; Daphné Bavelier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Automatic correction of hand pointing in stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Yalin Song; Yaoru Sun; Jinhua Zeng; Fang Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.