Literature DB >> 9807540

Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care.

A L Hillman1, K Ripley, N Goldfarb, I Nuamah, J Weiner, E Lusk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of feedback and financial incentives on physician compliance with cancer screening guidelines for women 50 years of age and older in a Medicaid health maintenance organization (HMO).
METHODS: Half of 52 primary care sites received the intervention, which included written feedback and a financial bonus. Mammography, breast exam, colorectal screening, and Pap testing compliance rates were evaluated.
RESULTS: From 1993 to 1995, screening rates doubled overall (from 24% to 50%), with no significant differences between intervention and control group sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives and feedback did not improve physician compliance with cancer screening guidelines in a Medicaid HMO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807540      PMCID: PMC1508575          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  19 in total

1.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an HMO population.

Authors:  R E Myers; B J Trock; C Lerman; T Wolf; E Ross; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Effect of medical records' checklists on implementation of periodic health measures.

Authors:  C Cheney; J W Ramsdell
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Financial incentives for physicians in HMOs. Is there a conflict of interest?

Authors:  A L Hillman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance.

Authors:  W M Tierney; S L Hui; C J McDonald
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback.

Authors:  R N Winickoff; K L Coltin; M M Morgan; R C Buxbaum; G O Barnett
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in cancer screening--United States, 1987 and 1992.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-02-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  How do financial incentives affect physicians' clinical decisions and the financial performance of health maintenance organizations?

Authors:  A L Hillman; M V Pauly; J J Kerstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Promoting cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial of three interventions.

Authors:  S J McPhee; J A Bird; C N Jenkins; D Fordham
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-08

10.  Microcomputer-generated reminders. Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  C V Chambers; D J Balaban; B L Carlson; J A Ungemack; D M Grasberger
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices.

Authors:  Sherri P Varnell; David M Murray; Jessica B Janega; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The use of three strategies to improve quality of care at a national level.

Authors:  Jeannette P P So; James G Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Pay for Performance in Medicaid: Evidence from Three Natural Experiments.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Mary Beth Landrum; Jacob A Robbins; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Physician pay-for-performance. Implementation and research issues.

Authors:  Jon B Christianson; David J Knutson; Roger S Mazze
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  A pediatric-focused review of the performance incentive literature.

Authors:  Alyna T Chien; Rena M Conti; Harold A Pollack
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.856

6.  Payment for performance in health care.

Authors:  Russell Mannion; Huw T O Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-09

7.  Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter?--Experience from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sukyung Chung; Latha Palaniappan; Eric Wong; Haya Rubin; Harold Luft
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Medicaid Pay for Performance Programs and Childhood Immunization Status.

Authors:  Tianyan Hu; Sandra L Decker; Shin-Yi Chou
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  William M Tierney; J Marc Overhage; Michael D Murray; Lisa E Harris; Xiao-Hua Zhou; George J Eckert; Faye E Smith; Nancy Nienaber; Clement J McDonald; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Physician perception of reimbursement for outpatient procedures among managed care patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; Edward F Tierney; William H Herman; Carol M Mangione; K M Venkat Narayan; Robert B Gerzoff; Dori Bilik; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.