Literature DB >> 2769192

Microcomputer-generated reminders. Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines.

C V Chambers1, D J Balaban, B L Carlson, J A Ungemack, D M Grasberger.   

Abstract

Recent studies have documented that physician compliance with recommended periodic health screening improves with reminders to physicians. These reminders, however, are often costly to maintain and modify. This study investigates the influence of a microcomputer tickler system on the ordering of mammograms. All women (N = 1262) aged 40 years and older who made visits to an outpatient office during a 6-month period were randomly assigned to one of two groups. For the experimental group, the date of the last mammogram ordered and recorded in the clinical database was printed on the encounter form generated for each patient visit. No information regarding previous mammograms was printed for patients in the control group. Women in the experimental group were more likely to have a mammogram ordered during the study period (19% compared with 12%, P = .001) and, as a result, were more likely to be in compliance with mammography guidelines at the study's completion (27% compared with 21%, P = .011). Microcomputerized data storage and retrieval systems may help increase physicians' attention to preventive health screening recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2769192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  21 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; R P Grol; T van der Weijden; C van Weel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 3.  Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

Review 4.  Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas R Talbot; David L Sanders; S Trent Rosenbloom; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Mammography in a health maintenance organization.

Authors:  J P Hansen; P A Knapp; P A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  A L Hillman; K Ripley; N Goldfarb; I Nuamah; J Weiner; E Lusk
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A template-based approach to support utilization of clinical practice guidelines within an electronic health record.

Authors:  S B Henry; K Douglas; G Galzagorry; A Lahey; W L Holzemer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  S Shea; W DuMouchel; L Bahamonde
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Monitoring visual status: why patients do or do not comply with practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Derek S Brown; Emily Streyer Carlisle; Gabriel A Picone; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.