Literature DB >> 16637965

Physician pay-for-performance. Implementation and research issues.

Jon B Christianson1, David J Knutson, Roger S Mazze.   

Abstract

Recent research underscores the gaps that exist between evidence-based medical practices and the care that many patients actually receive. Recognizing this, large purchasers are experimenting with new reimbursement arrangements called pay-for-performance (P4P) that tie a portion of payments for physician services to measures of quality. Agency theory, from the discipline of economics, provides a perspective on the challenges P4P is likely to encounter. The focus of most P4P initiatives on medical group performance raises additional questions about its potential effectiveness as a catalyst for change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16637965      PMCID: PMC2557129          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00356.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  29 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effecting and leading change in health care organizations.

Authors:  V Weber; M S Joshi
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2000-07

3.  Many a slip between cup and lip. Process evaluation of a program to promote and support evidence-based public health practice.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Kristine Olaisen Talseth; Peter Bradley; Lena Nordheim; Arild Bjørndal
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2003-04

4.  Disseminating innovations in health care.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Assessing the influence of incentives on physicians and medical groups.

Authors:  Robert Town; Douglas R Wholey; John Kralewski; Bryan Dowd
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 6.  Penetrating the "black box": financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services.

Authors:  Douglas A Conrad; Jon B Christianson
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Rushika Fernandopulle; HyunSook Ryu Song; Bruce Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Performance failure of an evidence-based upper respiratory infection clinical guideline.

Authors:  P J O'Connor; G Amundson; J Christianson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  The unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease.

Authors:  T P Hofer; R A Hayward; S Greenfield; E H Wagner; S H Kaplan; W G Manning
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Targeting diabetes preventive care programs: insights from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey.

Authors:  Martha M Phillips
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  11 in total

1.  A state-of-the-art conference on implementing evidence in health care. Reasons and recommendations.

Authors:  Catarina I Kiefe; Anne Sales
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study.

Authors:  Ruth McDonald; Stephen Harrison; Kath Checkland; Stephen M Campbell; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-06-19

Review 3.  Performance measures in neuroradiology.

Authors:  D Seidenwurm; P Turski; J Barr; J Connors; M Lev; S Mukherji; E Russell
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Successful Resident Engagement in Quality Improvement: The Detroit Medical Center Story.

Authors:  Syed Ahmed Hussain; Camelia Arsene; Corinne Hamstra; Tess H Woehrlen; Wilhelmine Wiese-Rometsch; Suzanne R White
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-05

5.  Effect of the Pay-for-Performance Program for Breast Cancer Care in Taiwan.

Authors:  Raymond N C Kuo; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Physician Perception of Pay Fairness and its Association with Work Satisfaction, Intent to Leave Practice, and Personal Health.

Authors:  Audiey C Kao; Andrew J Jager; Barbara A Koenig; Arlen C Moller; Michael A Tutty; Geoffrey C Williams; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Outcomes of a Seven Practice Pilot in a Pay-For-Performance (P4P)-Based Program in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Rhonda M Johnson; Twyla Johnson; Sarah D Zimmerman; Gary M Marsh; Oralia Garcia-Dominic
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-03

8.  Measuring quality of care in patients with multiple clinical conditions: summary of a conference conducted by the Society of General Internal Medicine.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Sheldon Greenfield; Constance Fung; Barbara J Turner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Awareness of, attitude toward, and willingness to participate in pay for performance programs among family physicians: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chyi-Feng Jan; Meng-Chih Lee; Ching-Ming Chiu; Cheng-Kuo Huang; Shinn-Jang Hwang; Che-Jui Chang; Tai-Yuan Chiu
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 10.  Adoption of Innovation in Herpes Simplex Virus Keratitis.

Authors:  James Chodosh; Lawson Ung
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.