Literature DB >> 3736141

Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance.

W M Tierney, S L Hui, C J McDonald.   

Abstract

In an academic general medicine clinic, we performed a randomized, controlled trial to compare (1) the effects of supplying monthly feedback reports of compliance with preventive care protocols by 135 internal medicine house staff with (2) the effects of specific reminders given to them at the time of patient visits. The protocols were randomly divided into two groups, A and B, and half the house staff were given feedback for Group A and half for Group B. Thus, each group served as a control for the other. Each feedback group was also randomly assigned to receive reminders for either Group A or B protocols. House staff receiving feedback more often complied with fecal occult blood testing, mammography, pneumococcal vaccination, use of metronidazole, and combined Group A and B protocols than did controls (P less than 0.01). There was also significantly more compliance with the same protocols by house staff receiving reminders, but the increase for fecal occult blood testing, pneumococcal vaccination, and combined Group A protocols was twice that seen in physicians given feedback alone. In addition, reminders alone increased compliance with oral calcium supplementation. Overall compliance with the preventive care protocols was low: 10-15% in physicians receiving neither feedback nor reminders, increasing to 15-30% in those receiving reminders. Physician compliance with suggested preventive care protocols can be increased by both delayed feedback and immediate reminders, but reminders have a greater effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3736141     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198608000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  86 in total

1.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; R P Grol; T van der Weijden; C van Weel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies.

Authors:  J H Chuang; G Hripcsak; R A Jenders
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

4.  Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics.

Authors:  Jen-Hsiang Chuang; George Hripcsak; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Three decades of research on computer applications in health care: medical informatics support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Authors:  J Michael Fitzmaurice; Karen Adams; John M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Waste gas monitor reduces wasted volatile anesthetic.

Authors:  T Y Euliano; J H van Oostrom; J van der Aa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Facilitating prevention in primary care.

Authors:  J Ward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-02

8.  Long-term success with the national health objective for influenza vaccination: an institution-wide model.

Authors:  K L Nichol
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  William M Tierney; J Marc Overhage; Michael D Murray; Lisa E Harris; Xiao-Hua Zhou; George J Eckert; Faye E Smith; Nancy Nienaber; Clement J McDonald; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  A randomized trial of population-based clinical decision support to manage health and resource use for Medicaid beneficiaries.

Authors:  David F Lobach; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kevin J Anstrom; Garry M Silvey; Janese M Willis; Fred S Johnson; Rex Edwards; Jessica Simo; Pam Phillips; David R Crosslin; Eric L Eisenstein
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.