Literature DB >> 20059568

Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter?--Experience from a randomized trial.

Sukyung Chung1, Latha Palaniappan, Eric Wong, Haya Rubin, Harold Luft.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of incentive payment frequency on quality measures in a physician-specific pay-for-performance (P4P) experiment. STUDY
SETTING: A multispecialty physician group practice. STUDY
DESIGN: In 2007, all primary care physicians (n=179) were randomized into two study arms differing by the frequency of incentive payment, either four quarterly bonus checks or a single year-end bonus (maximum of U.S.$5,000/year for both arms). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Data were extracted from electronic health records. Quality measure scores between the two arms over four quarters were compared. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: There was no difference between the two arms in average quality measure score or in total bonus amount earned.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' responses to a P4P program with a small maximum bonus do not differ by frequency of bonus payment.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20059568      PMCID: PMC2838160          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01072.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  12 in total

1.  The use of physician financial incentives and feedback to improve pediatric preventive care in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  A L Hillman; K Ripley; N Goldfarb; J Weiner; I Nuamah; E Lusk
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Paying for quality improvement: compliance with tobacco cessation guidelines.

Authors:  Gail Amundson; Leif I Solberg; Maureen Reed; E Mary Martini; Richard Carlson
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2003-02

3.  Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Richard G Frank; Zhonghe Li; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; LeChauncy D Woodard; Tracy Urech; Christina Daw; Supicha Sookanan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Impact of pay-for-performance contracts and network registry on diabetes and asthma HEDIS measures in an integrated delivery network.

Authors:  Jeffrey Levin-Scherz; Nicole DeVita; Justin Timbie
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  A L Hillman; K Ripley; N Goldfarb; I Nuamah; J Weiner; E Lusk
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Effect of physician-specific pay-for-performance incentives in a large group practice.

Authors:  Sukyung Chung; Latha P Palaniappan; Laurel M Trujillo; Haya R Rubin; Harold S Luft
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines.

Authors:  Joachim Roski; Robert Jeddeloh; Larry An; Harry Lando; Peter Hannan; Carmen Hall; Shu-Hong Zhu
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. The Primary-Care Physicians of Monroe County.

Authors:  R W Kouides; N M Bennett; B Lewis; J D Cappuccio; W H Barker; F M LaForce
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood; Hugh Gravelle; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Urara Hiroeh; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  The use of three strategies to improve quality of care at a national level.

Authors:  Jeannette P P So; James G Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.

Authors:  Cheryl L Damberg; Melony E Sorbero; Susan L Lovejoy; Grant R Martsolf; Laura Raaen; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-12-30

3.  Effect of pay-for-performance incentives on quality of care in small practices with electronic health records: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Naomi S Bardach; Jason J Wang; Samantha F De Leon; Sarah C Shih; W John Boscardin; L Elizabeth Goldman; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Pay for performance for salaried health care providers: methodology, challenges, and pitfalls.

Authors:  John R Britton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

Review 5.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.

Authors:  Pieter Van Herck; Delphine De Smedt; Lieven Annemans; Roy Remmen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Walter Sermeus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings.

Authors:  Liying Jia; Qingyue Meng; Anthony Scott; Beibei Yuan; Lu Zhang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 8.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.

Authors:  Arash Rashidian; Amir-Houshang Omidvari; Yasaman Vali; Heidrun Sturm; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-04

Review 9.  The ABCs of incentive-based treatment in health care: a behavior analytic framework to inform research and practice.

Authors:  Steven E Meredith; Brantley P Jarvis; Bethany R Raiff; Alana M Rojewski; Allison Kurti; Rachel N Cassidy; Philip Erb; Jolene R Sy; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2014-03-19

10.  Heterogeneity in general practitioners' preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France.

Authors:  Mehdi Ammi; Christine Peyron
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.