Literature DB >> 9807005

Influence of pulse sequence, polarity and amplitude on magnetic stimulation of human and porcine peripheral nerve.

P J Maccabee1, S S Nagarajan, V E Amassian, D M Durand, A Z Szabo, A B Ahad, R Q Cracco, K S Lai, L P Eberle.   

Abstract

1. Mammalian phrenic nerve, in a trough filled with saline, was excited by magnetic coil (MC)-induced stimuli at defined stimulation sites, including the negative-going first spatial derivative of the induced electric field along a straight nerve, at a bend in the nerve, and at a cut nerve ending. At all such sites, the largest amplitude response for a given stimulator output setting was elicited by an induced damped polyphasic pulse consisting of an initial quarter-cycle hyperpolarization followed by a half-cycle depolarization compared with a predominantly 'monophasic' quarter-cycle depolarization. 2. Simulation studies demonstrated that the increased efficacy of the induced quarter-cycle hyperpolarizing-half-cycle depolarizing polyphasic pulse was mainly attributed to the greater duration of the outward membrane current phase, resulting in a greater outward charge transfer afforded by the half-cycle (i.e. quarter-cycles 2 and 3). The advantage of a fast rising initial quarter-cycle depolarization was more than offset by the slower rising, but longer duration depolarizing half-cycle. 3. Simulation further revealed that the quarter-cycle hyperpolarization-half-cycle depolarization showed only a 2.6 % lowering of peak outward current and a 3.5 % lowering of outward charge transfer at threshold, compared with a half-cycle depolarization alone. Presumably, this slight increase in efficacy reflects modest reversal of Na+ inactivation by the very brief initial hyperpolarization. 4. In vitro, at low bath temperature, the nerve response to an initial quarter-cycle depolarization declined in amplitude as the second hyperpolarizing phase progressively increased in amplitude and duration. This 'pull-down' phenomenon nearly disappeared as the bath temperature approached 37 C. Possibly, at the reduced temperature, delay in generation of the action potential permitted the hyperpolarization phase to reduce excitation. 5. Pull-down was not observed in the thenar muscle responses to median nerve stimulation in a normal human at normal temperature. However, pull-down emerged when the median nerve was cooled by placing ice over the forearm. 6. In a nerve at subnormal temperature straddled with non-conducting inhomogeneities, polyphasic pulses of either polarity elicited the largest responses. This was also seen when stimulating distal median nerve at normal temperature. These results imply excitation by hyperpolarizing-depolarizing pulse sequences at two separate sites. Similarly, polyphasic pulses elicited the largest responses from nerve roots and motor cortex. 7. The pull-down phenomenon has a possible clinical application in detecting pathologically slowed activation of Na+ channels. The current direction of the polyphasic waveform may become a significant factor with the increasing use of repetitive magnetic stimulators which, for technical reasons, induce a cosine-shaped half-cycle, preceded and followed by quarter-cycles of opposite polarity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807005      PMCID: PMC2231292          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.571bb.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  25 in total

1.  Relevance of stimulus duration for activation of motor and sensory fibers: implications for the study of H-reflexes and magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  M Panizza; J Nilsson; B J Roth; P J Basser; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-02

2.  Determining the site of stimulation during magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve.

Authors:  J Nilsson; M Panizza; B J Roth; P J Basser; L G Cohen; G Caruso; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-08

Review 3.  Peripheral nerve stimulation by induced electric currents: exposure to time-varying magnetic fields.

Authors:  J P Reilly
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Measurement of the electric field induced into inhomogeneous volume conductors by magnetic coils: application to human spinal neurogeometry.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; V E Amassian; L P Eberle; A P Rudell; R Q Cracco; K S Lai; M Somasundarum
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06

5.  A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced by magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve.

Authors:  B J Roth; L G Cohen; M Hallett; W Friauf; P J Basser
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  A program for simulation of nerve equations with branching geometries.

Authors:  M Hines
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1989-03

7.  Effects of induced electric fields on finite neuronal structures: a simulation study.

Authors:  S S Nagarajan; D M Durand; E N Warman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Focal magnetic stimulation of an axon.

Authors:  P J Basser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Thresholds for biological effects of time-varying magnetic fields.

Authors:  D McRobbie; M A Foster
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1984-05

10.  Modelling magnetic coil excitation of human cerebral cortex with a peripheral nerve immersed in a brain-shaped volume conductor: the significance of fiber bending in excitation.

Authors:  V E Amassian; L Eberle; P J Maccabee; R Q Cracco
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10
View more
  21 in total

1.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Yongqiang Zhao; Ulf Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  One-hertz subthreshold rTMS increases the threshold for evoking inhibition in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  S Bagnato; A Currà; N Modugno; F Gilio; A Quartarone; V Rizzo; P Girlanda; M Inghilleri; A Berardelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Orientation-specific fast rTMS maximizes corticospinal inhibition and facilitation.

Authors:  Tobias Tings; Nicolas Lang; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Magnetic stimulation of one-dimensional neuronal cultures.

Authors:  Assaf Rotem; Elisha Moses
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

7.  PET-based confirmation of orientation sensitivity of TMS-induced cortical activation in humans.

Authors:  Todd D Krieg; Felipe S Salinas; Shalini Narayana; Peter T Fox; David J Mogul
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Martin Sommer; Gary Thickbroom; Masashi Hamada; Alvero Pascual-Leonne; Walter Paulus; Joseph Classen; Angel V Peterchev; Abraham Zangen; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Tanja Kassuba; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  The cortical site of visual suppression by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Thielscher; A Reichenbach; K Uğurbil; K Uludağ
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.