Literature DB >> 1710972

Measurement of the electric field induced into inhomogeneous volume conductors by magnetic coils: application to human spinal neurogeometry.

P J Maccabee1, V E Amassian, L P Eberle, A P Rudell, R Q Cracco, K S Lai, M Somasundarum.   

Abstract

We measured the electric fields induced by round and figure "8" magnetic coils (MCs) in homogeneous and inhomogeneous volume conductors. In homogeneous media, the round MC held tangential (i.e., flat) to the volume conductor induced an annular electric field. When the round MC was held on-edge (i.e., orthogonal) to the volume conductor, the induced electric field consisted of two loops mainly parallel to the surface of the volume conductor and which approximated each other directly under the contacting edge of the MC. The tangentially oriented figure "8" MC similarly induced two electric field loops which approximated one another maximally under the region of the junction in its long axis. In a complex inhomogeneous volume conductor, such as a segment of human cervical-thoracic vertebral spine located eccentrically within a large cylindrical tank and submerged in isotonic saline, the direction of electric fields within the spinal canal and across the intervertebral neuroforamina was similar to that observed in the homogeneous volume conductor. However, in and near a single neuroforamen, the electric field and especially its first spatial derivative were markedly elevated compared to that recorded within the long central axis of the vertebral canal. Motor unit and compound muscle action potentials elicited in limb muscles by MC stimulation of human cervical spine confirmed predictions derived from the physical model. The predictions included: (1) absence of spinal cord stimulation compared to relative ease of nerve root stimulation by current that is most likely concentrated at the neuroforamina. When stimulating current is directed towards the periphery, the most likely low threshold site of stimulation is inferred to be just distal to the neuroforamina. It is emphasized that with supramaximal stimulation, more distal sites of excitation may occur; (2) invariant latency shifts at threshold intensities when moving the MC along the rostrocaudal axis of the cervical vertebral column; (3) significant effect (on motor unit activation thresholds) of the direction of induced current flow across the neuroforamina; (4) reduced stimulation when the targeted nerve roots are close to the null point of the electric field, i.e., between locations of high electric field intensity, of opposite polarity; and (5) relatively focal nerve root stimulation by the junction of a transversely orientated figure "8" MC, i.e., parallel to the nerve roots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1710972     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90076-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  8 in total

1.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Magnetic coil stimulation of straight and bent amphibian and mammalian peripheral nerve in vitro: locus of excitation.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; V E Amassian; L P Eberle; R Q Cracco
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Elucidating the mechanisms and loci of neuronal excitation by transcranial magnetic stimulation using a finite element model of a cortical sulcus.

Authors:  S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Influence of pulse sequence, polarity and amplitude on magnetic stimulation of human and porcine peripheral nerve.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; S S Nagarajan; V E Amassian; D M Durand; A Z Szabo; A B Ahad; R Q Cracco; K S Lai; L P Eberle
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Motor evoked potentials following cervical electrical stimulation in brachial plexus lesions.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; M Morena; C Caponnetto; C Trompetto; M Abbruzzese; E Favale
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Magnetic stimulation for non-homogeneous biological structures.

Authors:  Vessela T Krasteva; Sava P Papazov; Ivan K Daskalov
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A multiple regression model of normal central and peripheral motor conduction times.

Authors:  Stephan R Jaiser; Jonathan D Barnes; Stuart N Baker; Mark R Baker
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Controversies and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Transspinal Magnetic Stimulation: A Critical Review and Exploratory Trial in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

Authors:  Rafael Bernhart Carra; Guilherme Diogo Silva; Isabela Bruzzi Bezerra Paraguay; Fabricio Diniz de Lima; Janaina Reis Menezes; Aruane Mello Pineda; Glaucia Aline Nunes; Juliana da Silva Simões; Marcondes Cavalcante França; Rubens Gisbert Cury
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.964

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.