Literature DB >> 1380913

Determining the site of stimulation during magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve.

J Nilsson1, M Panizza, B J Roth, P J Basser, L G Cohen, G Caruso, M Hallett.   

Abstract

Magnetic stimulation has not been routinely used for studies of peripheral nerve conduction primarily because of uncertainty about the location of the stimulation site. We performed several experiments to locate the site of nerve stimulation. Uniform latency shifts, similar to those that can be obtained during electrical stimulation, were observed when a magnetic coil was moved along the median nerve in the region of the elbow, thereby ensuring that the properties of the nerve and surrounding volume conductor were uniform. By evoking muscle responses both electrically and magnetically and matching their latencies, amplitudes and shapes, the site of stimulation was determined to be 3.0 +/- 0.5 cm from the center of an 8-shaped coil toward the coil handle. When the polarity of the current was reversed by rotating the coil, the latency of the evoked response shifted by 0.65 +/- 0.05 msec, which implies that the site of stimulation was displaced 4.1 +/- 0.5 cm. Additional evidence of cathode- and anode-like behavior during magnetic stimulation comes from observations of preferential activation of motor responses over H-reflexes with stimulation of a distal site, and of preferential activation of H-reflexes over motor responses with stimulation of a proximal site. Analogous behavior is observed with electrical stimulation. These experiments were motivated by, and are qualitatively consistent with, a mathematical model of magnetic stimulation of an axon.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1380913     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90114-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  11 in total

1.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Magnetic stimulation of axons in a nerve bundle: effects of current redistribution in the bundle.

Authors:  S S Nagarajan; D M Durand; B J Roth; R S Wijesinghe
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Development of a non-invasive treatment system for urinary incontinence using a functional continuous magnetic stimulator (FCMS).

Authors:  N Ishikawa; S Suda; T Sasaki; T Yamanishi; H Hosaka; K Yasuda; H Ito
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Finding the Location of Axonal Activation by a Miniature Magnetic Coil.

Authors:  Hui Ye
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.387

5.  Influence of pulse sequence, polarity and amplitude on magnetic stimulation of human and porcine peripheral nerve.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; S S Nagarajan; V E Amassian; D M Durand; A Z Szabo; A B Ahad; R Q Cracco; K S Lai; L P Eberle
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Prediction of Force Recruitment of Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation From 3D Field Model of the Thigh.

Authors:  Stefan Goetz; Joerg Kammermann; Florian Helling; Thomas Weyh; Zhongxi Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Mechanisms and Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  James Giordano; Marom Bikson; Emily S Kappenman; Vincent P Clark; H Branch Coslett; Michael R Hamblin; Roy Hamilton; Ryan Jankord; Walter J Kozumbo; R Andrew McKinley; Michael A Nitsche; J Patrick Reilly; Jessica Richardson; Rachel Wurzman; Edward Calabrese
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Somatic inhibition by microscopic magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hui Ye; Lauryn Barrett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Modulation of sensorimotor cortex by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Eugen Gallasch; Monica Christova; Alexander Kunz; Dietmar Rafolt; Stefan Golaszewski
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Nerve Stimulation (rPMS) as Adjuvant Therapy Reduces Skeletal Muscle Reflex Activity.

Authors:  Volker R Zschorlich; Martin Hillebrecht; Tammam Tanjour; Fengxue Qi; Frank Behrendt; Timo Kirschstein; Rüdiger Köhling
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.